Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Education

Schoolchildren from Irpin will study law in a city that has just experienced occupation — where legal literacy became a matter of survival

# English Translation Irpin lyceum students gained access to a course taught by practicing lawyers — not as a career guidance program, but as a practical tool. It is significant that Irpin, where thousands of families faced property disputes, inheritance cases, and compensation claims after 2022, became the venue for such an experiment.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 8, 2026 · 2 min read

Schoolchildren from Irpin will study law in a city that has just experienced occupation — where legal literacy became a matter of survival

Legal Theory in a City Where Law Was Tested for Strength

Irpin is not a neutral context for launching legal education. After the occupation and deoccupation of 2022, the city became one of the centers of mass property disputes, lawsuits for compensation for destroyed housing, and cases concerning the inheritance of the deceased. It was here that the Department of Education and Science of Irpin City Council, the State Tax University, and the law firm "Yuriy Denysenko" launched the "Legal Choice" course for high school students.

The first practical step was a familiarization tour of students from Irpin Lyceum of Innovative Technologies to the educational and scientific institute of law at the State Tax University. Students saw the academic environment from the inside and heard about real trajectories for entering the legal profession.

What's Behind the Memorandum

A three-party agreement is not merely a declaration of intent. According to the signed document, the partnership provides for combining the university's academic base with the practice of a law firm: joint seminars, trainings, and workshops. The course covers substantive and procedural law — that is, not only "what is written in the law" but also "how it works in court."

"It is important for us that students not only gain theoretical knowledge but also understand how it is applied in practice."

— from the organizers' comments

The program also targets educators — meaning the stakes are not just about one generation of students, but about changing how law is taught in schools overall.

Why the "University + Practitioner" Model Is Rare in Ukrainian Schools

Standard school legal education in Ukraine is mostly a textbook-based course without practical application. Involving a law firm as a third party (alongside the university and city administration) is an attempt to bridge the gap between "knowing the norm" and "being able to defend a right." Such three-party partnerships at the school level are rare in Ukraine.

  • Substantive law — what a person owns and what rights they have
  • Procedural law — how to defend that right through court or negotiations
  • Practice from lawyers — real cases, not just articles from legal codes

For a city where some residents are still pursuing cases for compensation for destroyed property, legal literacy is not an abstract competency.

An Open Question

If within a year the course produces measurable results — for example, a share of graduates who will enter legal specialties or be able to independently navigate basic legal situations — the model could be replicated in other deoccupied communities with similar legal burdens on their populations. If not, the question remains: is a memorandum sufficient without fixed outcome metrics to call this a systemic project rather than a one-time initiative?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026