Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

1,567 drones in two days: Russia used 'ceasefire' to prepare for largest attack

# ISW Confirms: Russia Deliberately Accumulated Strike Weapons During May Ceasefire The Institute for the Study of War has confirmed that Russia consciously accumulated strike weapons during the May ceasefire. Now Zelenskyy has tasked the military and intelligence services with determining response formats.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 2 min read

1,567 drones in two days: Russia used 'ceasefire' to prepare for largest attack
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: Офіс президента)

On May 13 and 14, Russia launched 1,567 drones and 56 missiles of various types against Ukraine — an almost continuous two-day attack that President Volodymyr Zelensky called a "special terrorist tactic." According to him, air defense interception rate reached over 93%, but he stressed this is insufficient.

Ceasefire as a Preparation Window

The scale of the attack's timing is no coincidence. The ISW emphasizes that Russia's new strike tactic — launching unmanned aircraft over an extended continuous period — allows it to threaten more regions and disproportionately impact civilian areas.

"Russia likely used the ceasefire on May 9–11 to establish conditions and prepare for the possibility of delivering a massive series of strikes of such magnitude"

— Institute for the Study of War (ISW)

During the "ceasefire," a sharp increase in Russian use of Molniya-type attack drones was recorded — the number of strikes by these unmanned aircraft during the lull was higher than before it began.

What Hit and Where

On May 13, Russia launched mass strikes on western Ukraine: a missile hit a building in Uzhhorod, a drone struck a residential building in Ivano-Frankivsk, in Zhovkva in Lviv Oblast — a critical infrastructure facility, leaving the city without power.

In Ivano-Frankivsk, the number of casualties from the strike on the high-rise increased to ten, including two teenagers. In total, on May 13, there were 241 combat clashes between Ukrainian defense forces and Russian military.

On the night of May 14, the attack continued and became one of the largest strikes on Kyiv. In the capital, damage was recorded in Darnytskyy, Solomiyansky, Holosiyivsky, and Sviatoshynskyy districts.

After the Stavka: "Fair Response" Without Details

Following the meeting of the Stavka of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, Zelensky instructed the Defense Forces and special services to propose specific formats for response to the attack. No technical or operational details were disclosed — which in the context of military security is standard practice rather than evidence of inaction.

  • Air defense intercepted over 93% of targets over both days
  • The need to strengthen air defense was acknowledged at the level of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief
  • ISW confirmed: Russia uses prolonged wave attacks to exhaust interception systems
  • New tactic — accumulation between attacks under cover of negotiation pauses

The question remains open: if Russia systematically uses any ceasefire to prepare massive strikes — can any future period of silence be anything other than an operational window for the enemy?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026