Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

32 women wanted due to one mistake by Kharkiv TCC: what went wrong in Reserve+

# Kharkiv Military Enlistment Office Automatically Registered Dozens of Women Without Medical Training and Declared Them Wanted. Defense Ministry Says It's Fixed. But the Method the System Used and the Legal Loophole of "No Procedure to De-Register Due to Military Office Error" Remain Unanswered.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

32 women wanted due to one mistake by Kharkiv TCC: what went wrong in Reserve+
Застосунок "Резерв+" (Фото: Depositphotos)

Psychologist Agata Zakharyan learned she was on the wanted list from a district police officer. Mathematician Galyna Tsekhmistro found out from a phone call from a major. Neither are doctors, pharmacists, nor are they military-liable under any legitimate legal criteria. Yet both are in the Kharkiv TCC database marked as "draft evaders."

What happened

In March 2026, a scandal erupted in the media after Irina Haratsidi-Loginova — head of human resources at a private company — discovered herself on a wanted list through the Reserve+ application. According to Ukrainian Pravda, she found over 20 other women with the same status in the Shevchenko TCC in Kharkiv.

Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov confirmed during question time in the Verkhovna Rada: the reason was a technical error by that particular district TCC. The women were automatically entered into the database as healthcare workers and assigned military-accounting specialty 912 — a category for those working in field conditions.

"This was a technical problem on the part of the Kharkiv TCC. No woman was fined, all restrictions and wanted notices were removed."

Mykhailo Fedorov, Defense Minister, during Verkhovna Rada session

Where the system failed twice

First failure — technical: automatic entry into the registry without verification. Second failure — legal: when women came to the TCC to sort things out, they were removed from the wanted list, but not removed from the registry. According to TCC representatives, the law lacks a specific provision to "remove from registry due to military commissariat error."

The consequences for those affected were quite real:

  • inability to travel abroad;
  • risk of bank account blocking;
  • police calls for "clarification of information."

A total of 32 cases were documented. The Defense Ministry press service assured that the "wanted" status was removed two weeks ago, and complete removal from the Reserve+ registry will be completed by the end of April. No fines were issued.

Broader context

The incident occurred against the backdrop of general uncertainty about women's military registration. As legal publications explain, only women with medical or pharmaceutical qualifications are subject to mandatory registration. However, as the Kharkiv case demonstrated, the verification mechanism itself — who exactly enters the database and on what grounds — remains opaque: the database is populated automatically, and challenging an error through administrative procedures is harder than making the error in the first place.

Some of those affected have already gone to court. According to legal publications, the Kharkiv District Administrative Court in August 2025 satisfied a woman's lawsuit and recognized the TCC's actions in registering her as unlawful.

If the Defense Ministry does not introduce an automatic verification mechanism before entering the registry by the end of April — rather than after a scandal — the next similar incident will only be a matter of time and the name of another TCC.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026