Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

50 days without a trial: Ombudsman documents conditions at Uzhhorod Territorial Recruitment Center that prompted a criminal complaint

A representative of the Ombudsman's Office discovered illegal detention of up to 50 days, seizure of phones, unsanitary conditions and the ignoring of critical health conditions at the Uzhhorod Regional Territorial Recruitment Center (RTCC) — and filed a criminal complaint alleging offenses under four articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 4, 2026 · 2 min read

50 days without a trial: Ombudsman documents conditions at Uzhhorod Territorial Recruitment Center that prompted a criminal complaint
Приміщення Ужгородського РТЦК (Фото: Дмитро Лубінець)

When the Ombudsman's representative Andriy Kryuchkov arrived at the Uzhhorod District TCK on a monitoring visit, officials tried to obstruct the inspection. What was recorded despite the resistance, Dmytro Lubinets called "egregious violations" — and announced a criminal complaint.

What was recorded

People were held in the TCK premises for weeks: detentions lasting 21, 24, 30 and 50 days were confirmed — without any court decision. According to Lubinets, any restriction of liberty without a court decision directly contradicts the Constitution of Ukraine and Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In one photo — a veteran with a combatant's ID, which did not save him from being held. In another — a man with a physical disability that, according to the Ombudsman, is "impossible not to notice".

"Only after my Representative intervened was an ambulance called for a man with blood pressure 190 over 100, who had been asking for help for several days. He was hospitalized with a life-threatening condition."

Dmytro Lubinets, Ombudsman of Ukraine

Living conditions: for 40–60 people — 3 mugs and 8 metal plates, people ate in turns from unwashed dishes; one shower and one toilet for several dozen people. Detainees who were not formally registered had their documents and phones confiscated — depriving them of any possibility to contact family or a lawyer.

Legal framework: what this means in legal terms

As a result of the visit, the Ombudsman's Office filed a statement on criminal offenses under Articles 146 (illegal deprivation of liberty), 127 (torture), 344 (interference in the activities of a state official) and 426-1 (exceeding authority by a military service person) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. This is not just a complaint — it is a formal basis for entry into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations (URPI) and the start of a pre-trial investigation.

According to the Ombudsman's Office, in January–October 2025 nearly 5,000 complaints about the actions of TCKs were recorded — compared with 3.4 thousand for the whole of 2024. Uzhhorod is not an exception, but a documented example of the trend.

Why the Ombudsman is speaking about this openly

Lubinets directly responded to the argument about "playing into propaganda":

"In reality, it is lawlessness that plays into the hands of the enemy, because legal protection mechanisms are not working, and with each passing day the situation only worsens."

Dmytro Lubinets

At the same time the Ombudsman differentiated positions: he condemned both the actions of the TCKs and the attacks on their employees — acknowledging that mobilization is necessary, but "everything must take place exclusively within the legal framework".

Notably, certain units of the same Uzhhorod TCK — in particular the military law enforcement service — received a positive assessment for their cooperation during the inspection. That is, the problem is not institutional as a whole, but related to specific officials who now face the threat of criminal proceedings.

If law enforcement enters the materials into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations and the case reaches the stage of formal suspicion — it will become the first publicly documented precedent of criminal liability for TCK leadership. The question is whether the prosecutor's office will open proceedings before specific officials have time to change their place of service.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026