Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

52% of Poles support reinstating conscription — a signal for the security of Ukraine and Europe

An Opinia24 poll shows a sharp shift in support for conscription, rising from 35% in 2022 to 52% now. Why is this important for neighboring countries, particularly Ukraine, and what consequences might such societal readiness have?

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 2 min read

52% of Poles support reinstating conscription — a signal for the security of Ukraine and Europe
Польські військові (Ілюстративне фото: ЕРА)

Brief conclusion

An Opinia24 survey for RMF FM (2–4 February 2026, n=1001) records that 52% of Poles now support the reinstatement of compulsory conscription (31% — categorically). This is a noticeable jump compared with IBRiS data for Rzeczpospolita in autumn 2022, when only about 36% were in favor of the draft.

What the sources say

"A remarkable change in mood"

— RMF FM, comment on the Opinia24 survey

The survey also shows clear demographic and political divides: stronger support for conscription among men (57%), people aged 50–59 (61%), and voters of the Law and Justice party (73%). Most opposed are 25–29-year-olds, people with higher education, and some of Rafał Trzaskowski's voters.

Why opinion changed — brief reasons

The rise in support did not occur in a vacuum. Several factors, also important for Ukraine, influenced it:

  • Increased sense of threat — regular violations of Polish airspace by Russia and incidents involving balloons from Belarus are perceived as part of a systematic reconnaissance strategy.
  • Political response — both government and opposition announce they are building up their own defence capabilities: for example, Donald Tusk's statement about beginning to build a "shield" against Russian drones.
  • European context — a Polling Europe survey (September 2025) showed that most Europeans are not confident in the continent's readiness for a prolonged military confrontation.

What this means for Ukraine

The increased readiness of Polish society has several practical implications for Ukraine:

  • Strengthening the neighbor's potential — even partial reintegration of conscription increases mobilization resources and the capacity for sustained operations or airspace defense.
  • Stabilization of NATO's eastern flank — a stronger Poland makes the region less vulnerable and reduces risks to Ukraine's borders in the event of escalation.
  • Cooperation and logistics — the shift in public support could speed up political and budgetary decisions on aid to Ukraine and joint air-defence and counter-drone projects.

"Poland is beginning to build its own 'shield' against Russian drones"

— Donald Tusk, statement 30 January 2026

Political risks and domestic division

Support for conscription correlates with electoral preferences: this may deepen internal political disagreements and become a subject of active political competition. For Ukraine, it is important that these discussions do not lead to destabilization, but instead turn into practical defense and cooperation measures.

Short forecast

The shift toward support for conscription is an indicator that Polish society is prepared to respond to rising threats. For Ukraine, this is a chance to strengthen partnership with a powerful and mobilized neighbor, but also a challenge — to coordinate efforts to turn public will into concrete defense and interoperability projects.

As declarations are transformed into budgets and structures, the key question remains: will partners be able to turn public support into effective security instruments that work both to protect Ukraine and to deter the aggressor?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026