Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

52 killed after three days of silence: how Russia used the ceasefire to accumulate strike

A week after the end of the three-sided announced ceasefire, Russia launched over 4,500 weapons against Ukraine and killed 52 people. ISW documented that during the ceasefire itself, Russia was increasing its drone stockpiles rather than halting military operations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 17, 2026 · 2 min read

52 killed after three days of silence: how Russia used the ceasefire to accumulate strike
Частково зруйнований будинок у Дарницькому районі Києва через атаку РФ (Фото: Telegram-канал Зеленського)

52 people were killed, 346 were wounded — among them 22 children. This is the toll from one week following the three-day ceasefire of May 9-11, which Washington promoted as a first step toward peace. President Volodymyr Zelensky published the figures on Telegram.

«During this week, Russians fired over 3,170 attack drones at Ukraine, more than 1,300 guided aerial bombs and 74 rockets of various types, with most being ballistic. Many struck residential buildings and other civilian infrastructure».

Volodymyr Zelensky, Telegram

In total — over 4,500 weapons in seven days. For comparison: this is more than Russia had on average used in any previous week since the start of the full-scale invasion.

Ceasefire as a Window for Accumulation

The strikes were not improvisation. ISW documented that during the ceasefire itself, Russia did not simply reduce activity — it used the pause to bring up reserves and build up supplies. A Ukrainian brigade on the Lyman direction reported: Russians held «Molniya» drones until the ceasefire was announced, then sharply increased their use precisely during the three «quiet» days.

According to ISW, NASA FIRMS satellite monitoring confirmed a reduction, but not cessation, of hostilities on May 9-11. Both sides mutually accused each other of violations. On the Kupiansk direction, Russian forces continued attempts to break through to Ukrainian Armed Forces positions on the left bank of the Oskil — even during the ceasefire days.

Air Defense and Anti-Ballistic Systems: What Zelensky Presented to Europe

Against the backdrop of these statistics, Zelensky voiced a specific demand: the PURL program, additional contributions for anti-ballistic missiles, and — for the first time so directly — joint European protection against ballistic weapons. «We must be self-sufficient in defense so that Russian air terror cannot threaten either Ukraine or any other country on the continent», the president emphasized. Earlier, Zelensky reported that France was prepared to help Ukraine develop anti-ballistic systems.

  • 3,170+ attack drones per week
  • 1,300+ guided aerial bombs (KAB)
  • 74 rockets, predominantly ballistic
  • 52 civilians and military killed
  • 346 wounded, including 22 children

The tactical picture is evident: the ceasefire gave Russia time, not restraint. If subsequent negotiation pauses occur without a mechanism to verify the movement of ammunition and reserves — each «ceasefire» risks becoming preparation for the next wave.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026