Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

60+ into the ranks: Zelensky authorizes one-year contracts for those above the mobilization age

Now citizens aged 60 and older can voluntarily enter into one‑year contracts during martial law — an important decision for the personnel reserve, but with clear limitations and requirements.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 3 min read

60+ into the ranks: Zelensky authorizes one-year contracts for those above the mobilization age
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

What changed

The President signed a decree that, during martial law, allows persons aged 60 and over to sign one-year contracts for military service. The document was published on the official website of the head of state — it is a direct legal mechanism, not a recommendation.

"During martial law, persons aged 60 and over may sign one-year contracts for military service."

— Decree of the President of Ukraine

Who it applies to and the conditions

Briefly: 60+ during martial law can sign a one-year contract and, under certain conditions, extend it for the same period. At the same time, several restrictions apply:

  • enlistment under the contract is possible only with the written consent of the commander of the military unit;
  • a positive assessment by a military medical commission is required — fitness in terms of health;
  • for officer positions, recruitment takes place only after the candidate is approved by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine;
  • in the event of the termination or cancellation of martial law, such contracts are terminated early and the persons are discharged from military service.

How to apply — practical steps

To join the Armed Forces of Ukraine under this procedure, you need to:

  1. obtain a letter (written consent) from the commander of the military unit;
  2. apply to the territorial recruitment center at your place of residence with the appropriate application and the commander’s letter;
  3. undergo a military medical commission to determine fitness;
  4. in the case of an officer position — wait for approval from the General Staff.

Why it matters — rationale for the decision

The decision makes it possible to quickly bring in people with specific skills and managerial experience, reducing the burden on younger age groups of the mobilization reserve. It is a logical step in a situation where the balance between the need for personnel and the restrictions of age and health requires flexibility.

At the same time the mechanism is selective: the medical commission and commander selection ensure that those who are truly fit and needed in specific roles enter service — often not on the front lines, but in logistics, technical support, training, or management.

Context and consequences

Currently, during martial law, men aged 25–60 formally remain liable for military service. On February 10 the Minister of Defense reported that the Verkhovna Rada is to consider this plenary week a draft law on the possibility of obtaining a one-year deferral from mobilization after completing service under the "18–24" contract — this is part of a broader package of changes in defense personnel policy.

Personnel experts note that the President’s decision adds operational capacity and demonstrates a pragmatic approach — but its effectiveness will depend on how quickly the system of medical examinations operates, who exactly and in which positions will be deployed, and on guarantees of social protection for those who go into service.

Conclusion

In the short term the decree expands options for recruiting qualified people and gives commanders a tool for targeted replenishment of units. In the longer term the result will depend on the administration of the process: medical commissions, clear delineation of roles, and state guarantees for contract servicemembers of advanced age. The issue on the agenda is not only quantity, but the quality and safety of those we involve in defending the country.

Source: official website of the President of Ukraine; notes — statements from the Ministry of Defense.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026