Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"611 attacks and three killed: how Mykolaiv became one of the leaders in aggression against the TCC"

Mykolaiv region recorded 31 attacks on military conscription centers since 2022 — ranging from beatings to stab wounds. Against the national backdrop, this is not an exception but part of a trend: the number of incidents across Ukraine more than doubles every year.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

"611 attacks and three killed: how Mykolaiv became one of the leaders in aggression against the TCC"
Військовий (фото: Генштаб ЗСУ)

In Mykolaiv region since 2022, 31 cases of unlawful actions against TCC and SES workers have been documented. Among the recorded injuries are bruises, abrasions, chemical burns, fractures, cutting and stabbing wounds. In Zhytomyr region, such cases remain isolated. This follows from responses from both regional TCC offices to LIGA.net inquiries.

Mykolaiv is not an anomaly but a symptom. According to National Police data, as of April 5, 2026, across Ukraine 611 cases of resistance or attacks on TCC and SES workers have been documented, three of whom were killed.

Dynamics: more than doubled annually

Statistics on attacks in Ukraine for complete years look as follows:

  • 2022 — 5 cases
  • 2023 — 38
  • 2024 — 118
  • 2025 — 341
  • since the beginning of 2026 — over 100

The most incidents were recorded in Kharkiv region — 68, in Kyiv — 53, in Dnipropetrovsk — 44. Mykolaiv does not appear in this leading trio, but 31 cases over four years is a sustained rather than situational problem.

Why the violence now

National Police Chief Ivan Vyhivskyi explained the aggression directly:

"Society knows about corruption cases in TCC and SES, when people subject to mobilization are released for money. Therefore, trust in these structures is minimal, and even a formal document check causes aggression."

Ivan Vyhivskyi, Chief of the National Police of Ukraine — in an interview with Censor.NET

There is a basis for such perception: since May 2025, within the "Guardian" operation through the end of March 2026, 325 suspects and 115 indictments in corruption cases related to mobilization have become known. Bribes for "getting out" of mobilization range from several hundred to thousands of dollars depending on the stage of the procedure.

The most resonant incident

On April 2, 2026 in Lviv during awareness activities, a military TCC worker was killed — stab wounds proved incompatible with life. This case became the most high-profile, but not the first: in Odesa on March 30, a man subject to mobilization opened fire on a TCC minibus, with one military personnel receiving severe injuries.

The typology of injuries documented by the Mykolaiv regional TCC — bruises, abrasions, fractures, chemical burns, cutting and stabbing wounds — indicates that attacks are not spontaneous clashes. Some of them suggest premeditation or the use of improvised weapons.

If the state does not break the link between corruption in the TCC and violence against its workers — that is, does not reduce the actual level of corruption, not merely the number of cases — will the growth of attacks stop after the active mobilization phase ends, or will it become an established form of protest?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026