Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"703 weapons of destruction per day: ballistics were almost never intercepted in half of cases" Or alternatively: "703 strikes per day: ballistics remained unintercepted in nearly half of cases"

From April 15 to 16, Russia carried out one of its largest strikes in recent months — 44 missiles and 659 drones. The real problem is not the scale, but the fact that 11 of 19 ballistic missiles penetrated air defense systems.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 16, 2026 · 2 min read

"703 weapons of destruction per day: ballistics were almost never intercepted in half of cases"

Or alternatively:

"703 strikes per day: ballistics remained unintercepted in nearly half of cases"
Наслідки у Києві (Фото: ДСНС)

From 07:00 on April 15 to 07:00 on April 16, Russia deployed 703 weapons: 44 missiles and 659 drones. Ukraine's Air Force confirmed the figures and composition of the strike.

What Was Launched and What Was Shot Down

Ballistic missiles formed the core of the attack: 19 Iskander-M and S-400 rockets. Only eight of them were destroyed — less than half. Cruise missiles — 20 Kh-101s and five Iskander-K — were countered much more effectively by air defense. Out of 659 drones, the vast majority were shot down, although some still reached their targets.

"Threat of ballistic weapons deployment"

— warning from the Air Force on the night of April 16, according to Ukrainian Pravda

The difference in interception rates between ballistic and cruise missiles is not coincidental. According to CSIS estimates, from 2022 to 2024, Russia launched over 11,000 missiles with an average interception rate of 83.5%. However, ballistic missiles remain a separate category: their speed and trajectory make them fundamentally more challenging targets for existing air defense systems.

Where Strikes Hit

The heaviest consequences were in Kyiv: ballistic missiles struck the Podil, Obolon, and Shevchenko districts. Residential buildings were damaged. A child and a woman were killed, and among the wounded were medics who responded to calls. In Kharkiv — several fires and injuries. In Dnipro — a five-story building and an administrative building were damaged, with casualties including two children aged 1.5 and 3 years old. In Odesa, one person was killed and five wounded as a result of the drone attack.

Tactical Context

This was already the second major strike in a day: the previous night, on April 15, Russia deployed 327 weapons — three ballistic missiles and 324 UAVs. Air defense neutralized 309 targets then. Two consecutive mass strikes within one day is a tactic to deplete interceptor stocks faster than they can be replenished.

  • According to CSIS analysts, in the third quarter of 2025, an average of 42 ballistic missiles per month penetrated air defenses — roughly 1.5 per day. The April strike significantly exceeded this figure.
  • The Kh-101 and Iskander-K were launched from the Caspian Sea and Rostov region — standard geography to avoid interception zones over land.
  • 659 drones per day is an attrition strike: it forces air defense to operate continuously and "spend" interceptors on cheaper targets.

If Russia maintains the pace of two mass strikes per day, the key question is not how many drones air defense shoots down, but whether allies can replenish supplies of anti-missile systems capable of intercepting ballistic missiles — Patriot and SAMP/T — before the next such strike.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026