Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

72 Hours Until War Resumes: Why Trump Called an Emergency Meeting — and What's at Stake

A ceasefire between the US and Iran expires on April 22, with no follow-up negotiations scheduled, as Iran has again blocked the Strait of Hormuz. Trump called this "blackmail" and assembled his top command at the White House.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 19, 2026 · 3 min read

72 Hours Until War Resumes: Why Trump Called an Emergency Meeting — and What's at Stake
Дональд Трамп (Фото: Graeme Sloan / EPA)

On the morning of April 18, U.S. President Donald Trump convened a meeting in the Situation Room. The topic — a new crisis around the Strait of Hormuz and the course of negotiations with Iran. This was reported to Axios by two American officials on condition of anonymity.

What happened before the meeting

Following the failure of negotiations in Pakistan in early April — where the U.S. delegation was led by Vice President JD Vance and the Iranian delegation by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi — Washington announced a naval blockade of Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran responded by resuming control over shipping through the strait, imposing fees exceeding one million dollars for the passage of each vessel. Brent crude immediately jumped to $102 per barrel — 40% above pre-war levels.

On April 17, Iranian Minister Araghchi announced that the Strait of Hormuz is open to all shipping during the ceasefire period. Oil fell 11%. But the very next morning, Trump told his staff in the Oval Office that Iran had "outsmarted itself — wanted to close the strait again," and that the country "cannot blackmail us," according to Axios.

Why April 22 is more than just a date

The ceasefire achieved after the failure of the Islamabad negotiations expires exactly three days after the Situation Room meeting. There is no specific date set for the next round of negotiations. According to White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre, talks with Iran are "productive and ongoing" — but this is the same formula the American side used even before the Islamabad breakdown.

The positions of both sides remain far from compromise. According to CNBC, citing Iranian state television, Tehran is demanding:

  • control over the Strait of Hormuz and international recognition of Iranian sovereignty over it;
  • payment of war reparations;
  • a ceasefire across the entire region, including Lebanon;
  • unfreezing of frozen Iranian assets abroad.

The United States, for its part, insists on the complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear program, restrictions on its missile arsenal, and severing ties with pro-Iranian armed groups. The American 15-point proposal, delivered through Pakistan in March, was rejected by Tehran.

Economic pressure as an argument — and a trap

Before the invasion, approximately 20% of global oil supplies passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Karen Young, a senior research fellow at Columbia University, warned CNN that even after the conflict ends, prices will not fall quickly — until the strait operates at full capacity and damaged oil infrastructure is restored. "These are enormous variables that are absolutely unresolved right now," she said.

"If there is a blockade — we still have a deficit of approximately 7 million barrels of crude oil per day. And we have only increased it by removing Iranian barrels from the market".

Karen Young, Columbia University — CNN

Speaker of the Iranian Parliament Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf promised that the blockade will soon force Americans to "feel nostalgic for gas at $4-5," according to CNN. Trump, for his part, has stated that the blockade will remain "in full force" regardless of the fate of the ceasefire.

Who benefits from prolonging this

There is no consensus within the Trump administration regarding the scenario after April 22. According to CNN, most advisors do not want a resumption of combat — and understand that American public opinion is beginning to tire of the conflict. At the same time, Trump's harsh rhetoric leaves him little room for a "soft" continuation of the ceasefire without visible concessions from Tehran.

Iranian leadership, in turn, finds itself caught between two fires: Deputy Speaker of Parliament Hamid-Reza Haji Babaei stated that he "trusts the army, but not negotiations" — indicating internal pressure against any diplomatic concessions.

If by April 22 the parties do not announce at least the date of the next meeting — not an agreement, but merely a date — this will become the first concrete signal that the ceasefire will indeed not be extended.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026