Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

85 Sanctioned Targets and £1.2 Million: Britain and Canada Synchronized with Brussels Not by Accident

On May 11 in Brussels, the International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children convened — and that very day London and Ottawa announced new sanctions. This was no coincidence, but a coordinated diplomatic action with specific names, figures, and financial measures.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 2 min read

85 Sanctioned Targets and £1.2 Million: Britain and Canada Synchronized with Brussels Not by Accident
Повернення українських дітей з окупації (Фото: Дмитро Лубінець)

While Brussels hosted a meeting of the International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children on May 11, London and Ottawa simultaneously published sanctions lists. The synchronization was intentional: the United Kingdom and Canada are co-chairs of the coalition alongside Ukraine, and the sanctions became a public signal to the meeting rather than its consequence.

Who was sanctioned and why it matters

Britain added 85 individuals and organizations to its lists, of which 29 are directly linked to the deportation and militarization of children, while another 56 are connected to Kremlin disinformation campaigns. Among specific targets is the so-called "School of Warriors" (Center for Military-Sports Training and Patriotic Education of Youth), which according to the British government maintains a network of facilities throughout Russia and occupied territories of Ukraine. There, children undergo military training and indoctrination in pro-Kremlin ideology.

Yulia Velichko, the so-called "minister of youth policy" of the self-proclaimed "LNR," was personally sanctioned. She is accused of systematically implementing deportation programs, including issuing Russian passports to children from occupied territories.

Canada added 23 individuals and five organizations to its own sanctions list, calling the forced displacement of children a "serious violation of international humanitarian law."

Money for a mechanism that is still lacking

Alongside the sanctions, London announced an allocation of £1.2 million (over $1.5 million) to fund the Verification Center and the Tracking Mechanism—structures designed to identify and locate deported children. This is fundamental: international sanctions punish specific perpetrators, but returning children requires a separate infrastructure for searching—and this is precisely what has been critically lacking.

"Today's sanctions are a decisive step to expose and undermine Russia's willingness to destroy Ukraine's future through the abhorrent deportation and indoctrination of children"

— British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper

The scale of the problem in numbers

  • More than 20,000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly taken to Russia or within occupied territories
  • Approximately 6,000 of them have ended up in "re-education" camps where their Ukrainian identity is being eradicated
  • The International Coalition now unites 47 countries and international organizations, launched in Kyiv in February 2024

A coalition without a mechanism for return

The coalition, co-chaired by Canada and Ukraine since 2024, with the EU joining as a full member, coordinates diplomatic, humanitarian, and legal pressure. But not a single child will return home solely from sanctions against "LNR" officials. The key question remains unanswered: if Russia does not comply with the ICC's requirement to arrest Putin and Lvova-Belova and bring them to court—will the coalition move beyond sanctions and monitoring to direct diplomatic ultimatums capable of actually changing Moscow's behavior?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026