Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

86 "Molniya" in January: what Starlink's role reveals about the coordination of Russian strikes

The result of the electronic warfare unit’s work is quantitative evidence of how satellite internet changed the speed and accuracy of Russia’s strikes. Why this matters right now — we examine with an expert.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 10, 2026 · 2 min read

86 "Molniya" in January: what Starlink's role reveals about the coordination of Russian strikes
Іван Киричевський (Фото: Facebook-акаунт військового)

Raid of the 413th Regiment: numbers as a mirror of the problem

Electronic warfare operators of the 413th Regiment "Raid" suppressed 86 Russian Molniya-type strike UAVs in January. This number was named in an interview with LIGA.net by a "Raid" serviceman and Defense Express weapons expert Ivan Kyrychevskyi. The fact itself is not just a statistic: behind it lies a technological dependency that allowed the Russian Federation to strengthen battlefield coordination.

Why Starlink mattered for the Russians

According to Kyrychevskyi, satellite internet terminals served the Russians as a tool of inter-service command. That meant small infantry groups, strike FPV drones and artillery could operate as a single system almost in real time — increasing the effectiveness of strikes and the difficulty of countering them from our side.

"Such a figure for suppressing Russian drones is a vivid illustration of the role Starlink performed for the Russians... For them it was exactly a tool of inter-service command, needed to combine small infantry groups, strike UAVs into a single striking fist, and to have all that supported almost in real time by guided bombs and artillery strikes"

— Ivan Kyrychevskyi, "Raid" serviceman, Defense Express expert

What exactly is being used and how it works

The Molniya is a cheap fixed-wing strike UAV often used as a kamikaze drone. It has a small mass and simple construction (fuselage ~1.5 m, wingspan ~1.2 m); the payload can even include an anti-tank mine TM-62M, speed up to ~90 km/h and a flight range of at least 40 km. Because of their low cost and ease of production, these devices are used to wear down air defense (AD) and electronic warfare (EW) systems.

Context: what changed after Starlink was found on drones

In January there were reports of the first cases of satellite internet being used in Russian attacks (incidents near Kropyvnytskyi and a drone flight to Dnipro were mentioned). After that, Ukraine introduced registration of terminals — for both military and civilian use — and announced disconnection of unverified devices. This is a direct step intended to reduce the enemy's access to uncontrolled command channels.

Consequences and outlook

Kyrychevskyi notes that flights of Molniyas have not been completely halted — the drones continue to be used, but the loss of a simple unified communications platform reduces the potential for mass coordination. In his assessment, the Russian Federation is already looking for alternative solutions in the field of satellite communications, but each such replacement will require time and resources.

What this means for us: restricting access to unverified terminals is not an instant "end" to drones, but a strategic step toward complicating the enemy's rapid and centralized coordination of attacks. The next question is how quickly partners and our services can turn a temporary gain into a long-term technological advantage.

Source: interview with LIGA.net; comments by Ivan Kyrychevskyi (Defense Express); open reports on terminal registration in Ukraine.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026