Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"91 vessels and no breakthrough: how US Marines are stopping Iranian oil in the Gulf of Oman"

An American Marine aboard the M/T Celestial Sea marks the 91st case of a forced vessel turnaround since the blockade began. Over 38 days, the United States has cut off Iran's oil revenue by $4.8 billion.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 20, 2026 · 2 min read

"91 vessels and no breakthrough: how US Marines are stopping Iranian oil in the Gulf of Oman"
Морпіхи США (Фото: U.S. Central Command)

On May 20, 2026, U.S. Marine Corps personnel from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (31st MEU) boarded the Iranian oil tanker M/T Celestial Sea in the Gulf of Oman. The vessel was heading toward an Iranian port, circumventing the naval blockade that Washington had imposed on April 13. After searching the crew, they were ordered to change course; there were no casualties, and the vessel was released.

What is this blockade and why isn't Celestial Sea the first

The blockade covers Iran's entire coastline — from Persian Gulf ports to the Arabian Sea. According to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Kane, it extends even to ships that departed from Iran before the blockade began. That is why operations continue not only in the Gulf of Oman but also in the Bay of Bengal.

At the time of the Celestial Sea incident, CENTCOM had already redirected 91 commercial vessels. Four ships were forcibly disabled — after their crews ignored warnings. The first forceful precedent occurred on April 19: marines from the same 31st MEU rappelled from helicopters onto the Iranian cargo ship M/V Touska — after six hours of refusing to comply, the destroyer USS Spruance opened fire on the engine room.

"American forces continue to fully enforce the blockade and have redirected 91 commercial vessels to date"

CENTCOM, May 20, 2026

Scale: what the blockade means for Iran

Oil revenues account for over 40% of Iran's exports. According to Pentagon estimates, in just the first weeks of the blockade, Iran lost $4.8 billion in oil revenues. Meanwhile, TankerTrackers analyst Samir Madani documented at least 26 Iranian vessels that circumvented the blockade by hugging Pakistan's and India's coasts toward the Strait of Malacca — meaning a leakage scheme already exists.

  • 91 vessels redirected from April 13 to May 20
  • 4 vessels forcibly disabled
  • 10,000+ American military personnel deployed on day one of the operation
  • $4.8 billion — estimated Tehran's losses in oil revenue

Iran's response: between rhetoric and real action

Tehran officially called the blockade "piracy" and illegal under international law. The Khatam al-Anbia command warned of "retaliation." Meanwhile, no symmetrical action followed the capture of Celestial Sea — Iran continues to block the Strait of Hormuz, through which 25% of global maritime oil trade and 20% of LNG passed before the crisis began.

In parallel, President Trump on May 19 publicly suggested readiness for new airstrikes on Iran if diplomatic ceasefire negotiations reach a dead end. This is the first public signal of this kind since the ceasefire regime began.

Celestial Sea was released — unlike Touska, which was seized. The difference in approaches remains unexplained officially: if the U.S. applies seizures selectively rather than systematically, what exactly determines the line between "redirecting course" and "boarding with seizure"?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026