Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Abu Dhabi: Trilateral dialogue leaves political questions unresolved — what it means for Ukraine

The two-day talks between Ukraine, the United States and Russia in the UAE were the first major tripartite format in a long time. We break down what was discussed, which issues remain unresolved, and how this threatens or helps Ukraine now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Abu Dhabi: Trilateral dialogue leaves political questions unresolved — what it means for Ukraine

What happened

On January 23–24, two-day talks were held in Abu Dhabi with delegations from Ukraine, Russia and the United States. Following the meetings, President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the discussions covered a wide range of topics — above all the military parameters for ending the war, as well as a number of complex political issues that remain unresolved.

“This was the first in a long time trilateral format of dialogue aimed at ending the war. The meetings discussed a range of substantive issues, primarily military ones, which are needed to end the war. We also spoke about difficult political questions that are still not resolved.”

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Positions of the parties

Kyiv confirmed its unchanged position regarding territorial integrity and Ukraine’s right to defend its sovereignty. The President stressed that Kyiv and Moscow have fundamentally different approaches, while the American side is trying to find a possible compromise.

According to agencies, there was also a meeting in the UAE between representatives of Kyiv and Moscow “without Americans in the room” (Axios), and anonymous American officials told CNN that the talks “exceeded expectations.” U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff reported that the negotiations focused on several key issues (Reuters).

Why this matters for Ukraine

First, the trilateral format itself carries weight: when Kyiv, Moscow and Washington are involved in talks, the likelihood increases that any agreements will have international mechanisms for implementation. Second, key political questions remain unresolved, which means diplomacy does not immediately translate into peace guarantees — until Moscow changes its readiness for concrete steps, risks on the front line remain.

Next steps

Zelensky announced new trilateral meetings for the current week; the U.S. special envoy and unnamed officials also suggested the dialogue in the UAE may continue (a February 1 date was mentioned). This indicates the negotiation process could become periodic — but outcomes will depend not on the formats themselves, but on the parties’ willingness to compromise and on how well Ukraine’s partners can provide real guarantees.

Brief conclusion

The talks in Abu Dhabi are an important signal: diplomacy is restoring interaction between capitals, and international mediators are stepping up. However, painful political questions remain on the table. For Ukraine, the key task is to turn these meetings into clear security guarantees and back into practical steps that can strengthen resilience at the front and provide long-term protection of territorial integrity.

Sources: speech by the President of Ukraine; Reuters, Axios, CNN (anonymous officials and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff)

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026