Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Drone Army — 2025: over 820,000 targets struck and 240,000 occupiers eliminated — what it means for the front line

Official results of the "Army of Drones" project have shown a large-scale effect on the battlefield. We examine which of these figures reflect reality and why this matters for security and defensive resilience.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Drone Army — 2025: over 820,000 targets struck and 240,000 occupiers eliminated — what it means for the front line

Briefly

The Ministry of Defense published the 2025 results of the Army of Drones project. According to Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, operators struck nearly 820,000 enemy targets, among them — more than 240,000 occupiers eliminated, as well as thousands of pieces of equipment and UAVs. These are results worth reading not as a flashy headline, but as a signal of a change in tactics and the defense’s resource potential.

“In 2025, within the framework of the Army of Drones project, nearly 820,000 enemy targets were struck; more than 240,000 occupiers eliminated; 62,000 strikes on light vehicles, 29,000 on heavy vehicles, 32,000 strike and reconnaissance UAVs.”

— Mykhailo Fedorov, Minister of Defense (summary of the event “Army of Drones – 2025”)

What exactly was announced

The official figures describe a wide range of results: from striking ground vehicles to neutralizing personnel and destroying enemy drones. The project, launched in 2022, combines state procurement, volunteer initiatives and domestic production — and it is this mix that produced the scale effect.

Why this matters

First, such figures illustrate a shift in operational logic: mass, daily support drones are becoming not only tools for reconnaissance but instruments of continuous pressure on the enemy. Second, this reduces risks for infantry — strike tasks are carried out at range. Finally, the numbers send a signal to international partners about the effectiveness of investments and support.

Who is on the list of leaders

The minister named units and manufacturers that showed the best results: among them — “Madyar’s Birds”, the SBU special unit “Alpha”, “Lazar’s Group”, several assault brigades and battalions of unmanned systems. This underscores the joint contribution of regular forces, security services and volunteer networks.

Limitations and risks

Despite the impressive numbers, experts point to two caveats: first, official data require independent verification in specific cases; second, the adversary plans to scale up its UAV forces — according to reports, in 2026 the Russians may increase their contingent of unmanned systems to over 160,000 personnel. This means the technological and tactical advantage requires constant updating and protection against countermeasures.

Context: how the project works

Army of Drones is a state initiative that combines procurement, operator training and the development of local production. An important element of its success is the combination of state coordination with the flexibility of volunteer networks and charitable fundraising: this is how a fast supply and maintenance chain for drones is formed.

Conclusion

These results are not only a reason for pride but also a clear marker: the war is increasingly defined by technology, logistics and human capital. Now the question is for partners and the system: will it be possible to turn declarations and one-day successes into a stable position protected from escalation? The answer will determine how long Ukraine will retain an advantage in this dimension of the war.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026