Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Astrologer, Remand Prison, and Contact Ban: What Court Decided in Yermak's Case

# VACS Chose Custody for Yermak with 140 Million Hryvnia Bail and Separately Banned Communication with "Veronika Fenshu Office" The Specialized Anti-Corruption Court (VACS) selected custody with bail set at 140 million hryvnia for Yermak. Additionally, the court imposed a separate ban on communication with "Veronika Fenshu Office." Yermak's lawyer insists that the correspondence is personal in nature, not official.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 15, 2026 · 3 min read

Astrologer, Remand Prison, and Contact Ban: What Court Decided in Yermak's Case
Андрій Єрмак (Фото: Офіс президента)

In the phone of Andriy Yermak, the former head of the Presidential Office, investigators found a contact "Veronika Feng Shui Office" — and it was around this contact that one of the most unusual disputes in the High Anti-Corruption Court in recent years unfolded. SAP prosecutor Valentyna Hrebeniuk claimed that Yermak sent this person the birth dates of candidates for state positions and asked for astrological advice. The defense responded: the communication was private and had nothing to do with any appointments.

Who is "Veronika Feng Shui Office"

Journalists from "Schemes" (Radio Svoboda) established that behind the contact is Veronika Anikievych — a 51-year-old Kyivite who positions herself as an astrology consultant and runs the Telegram channel "Lunar Hours." In the phone books of various users, her contact was saved under the names "Veronika Consult. A.B." and "fortune teller Yermak." After Yermak's resignation, she publicly defended him and called NABU and SAP those who "sold out to the Russians."

A separate detail was the background of Anikievych's father: Fedir Anikievych lives in occupied Henichesk in Kherson region and holds Russian citizenship. In May 2025, he posed with St. George ribbons and Russian flags.

What exactly was discussed — the prosecution's version

According to investigation materials, the correspondence featured candidates for prime minister, minister of health, deputy head of the Presidential Office Oleh Tatarov, as well as the head of the State Property Management Agency Ihor Lysyy. The selection criterion, according to SAP, was the birth date of the candidate.

"We will comment on everything tomorrow."

Andriy Yermak — to journalists during a recess on May 13

Lawyer Ihor Fomin confirmed the fact of communication itself, but insisted: it occurred after Yermak left public service and had nothing to do with any appointments. "These are personal matters," the defense lawyer concluded in a comment to LIGA.net.

What the court decided — and why the detail about the ban matters

On May 14, the High Anti-Corruption Court chose detention with a bail of 140 million hrn for Yermak. Yermak ended up in pre-trial detention: the defense reported difficulties in raising funds. Lawyer Serhiy Svyryba — a former partner of the Asters law firm, connected to Yermak's circle through shared education — contributed part of the bail.

But procedurally significant was another moment: the court separately banned Yermak from communicating with Veronika Anikievych. For the court, this is a standard measure to protect the investigation from possible influence on witnesses or destruction of evidence. But the very appearance of such a ban in the ruling means: the court recognized the connection between the two individuals as procedurally significant — regardless of what content each side fills that communication with.

Case materials — 16 volumes of approximately 250 pages each. Lawyer Fomin admitted that the defense has not yet had time to fully review them. The main hearing on the merits has not yet begun.

The question that will determine the further course of the case: will the prosecution be able to prove that the correspondence with the astrologer took place precisely during the period when Yermak was in office — because if the defense proves otherwise, this episode will fall out of the evidentiary base completely, and the investigation will have to build the case exclusively on the financial materials of "Dynaste."

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026