Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Attacks on Bessarabia: Russia's goal — to paralyze Ukrainian logistics and exports

The destruction of bridges and strikes on ports — this is not just a regional tactic. We analyze why Moscow is targeting logistics, what the consequences are for Ukraine’s economy and security, and what needs to be done immediately.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 28, 2025 · 2 min read

Attacks on Bessarabia: Russia's goal — to paralyze Ukrainian logistics and exports

What's happening

Russian strikes on bridges and port infrastructure in the southern Odesa region are aimed not only at locally cutting off Bessarabia, but at systematically damaging Ukrainian logistics and export corridors. According to Deputy Prime Minister for Restoration Oleksii Kuleba, in 2025 there were about 90 combined missile‑drone attacks recorded on ports and their approaches.

Why this matters for the country and your wallet

A significant portion of agricultural exports passes through the ports of Odesa and the mouth of the Danube; fuel deliveries and critical shipments also arrive there. Damaged bridges and limited access to ports increase transportation costs, delay exports and make logistics more expensive for business and the military — this directly affects economic stability and the ability to defend itself.

"Their goal is to destroy Ukrainian logistics. That is what can weaken Ukraine both economically and militarily."

— Pavlo Lakiichuk, head of military security programs, Center for Global Studies "Strategy XXI"

Context: why the escalation is happening now

Experts link the intensification of attacks to the negotiation process between Ukraine and the United States — a way to raise the stakes and put additional pressure on Kyiv and its partners. At the same time, in practice the effectiveness of this tactic is limited: as Oleksii Melnyk of the Razumkov Centre notes, even after months of bombardment some key facilities, for example the bridge over Zatoka, remain partially functional.

"This is the maximum raising of the stakes and escalation of the situation... To say that Russia has achieved its goal is probably premature."

— Oleksii Melnyk, military expert, Razumkov Centre

Environmental and humanitarian toll

As a result of the strikes in the area of the "Delfin" and "Lanzheron" beaches, oil slicks and dead birds have been recorded — an additional blow to coastal infrastructure, tourism and fishing that will have long-term economic and environmental consequences.

What to do: immediate steps

Priorities are clear: strengthen protection of critical infrastructure, speed up repair operations to restore bridges and berths, diversify logistics corridors and coordinate with international partners the delivery of resources to protect ports. At the same time, clear diplomatic steps are needed to turn political support into practical guarantees for exports and security.

Conclusion

Attacks on Bessarabia are part of a broader strategy of pressure on Ukraine's economy and logistics, not random strikes. The question now is not only about repairing bridges, but whether partners will quickly turn stated support into concrete tools that reduce the vulnerability of our export and logistics corridors.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026