Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Of course we want more": Zelensky on sanctions, intelligence and Patriot missiles

The president thanked the United States for providing intelligence, halting the "shadow fleet" and supplying air‑defense systems, but urged stepped‑up pressure on the Kremlin — what this means for the front and Ukraine's reconstruction.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 20, 2026 · 2 min read

"Of course we want more": Zelensky on sanctions, intelligence and Patriot missiles

In brief — why this deserves attention

In response to a request in the Office of the President's chat, Volodymyr Zelensky combined thanks for concrete steps by the United States with a call to increase pressure on the Kremlin. This matters right now: intelligence data, air-defense deliveries and sanctions affect not only the tactical situation on the front, but also the ability to rebuild the country after victory.

What exactly the president said

"I'll be frank with you, we need to survive. We are fighting for our independence, for our freedom, for our existence. In this struggle we need any help"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Zelensky thanked the US for what he said was the "restoration of intelligence" cooperation and that "we have Patriot missiles." He also welcomed the halting of tankers from the "shadow fleet" and the introduction of energy sanctions, but added: "of course we want more".

"Not everything is perfect, but it's coming. We are grateful for such assistance"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Context and why this matters

First, the restoration of intelligence-data sharing increases the accuracy of strikes on the enemy's logistics and headquarters — this directly reduces its operational capabilities. Second, air-defense systems, such as the Patriot, change the level of protection of key facilities and the morale of the population. Third, sanctions, especially those hitting energy and shipping, constrain the Kremlin's resource base.

Experts at leading analytical centers point out that the combination of intelligence, defensive systems and financial-trade restrictions creates a synergy — each of these elements is important on its own, but together they amplify strategic pressure on Moscow.

Consequences for politics and the front

If partner actions continue and intensify, this provides two practical advantages for Ukraine: 1) better operational capabilities for advancing and holding positions; 2) political pressure that, in the long term, makes further aggressive actions costly for the Kremlin. Zelensky also referred to "nearly three important documents" that could lay the legal and financial groundwork for reconstruction — their signing and implementation will be a key indicator of partners' trust.

What next?

The president expressed gratitude and a demand at the same time: thanks for what has already been done and a request for more — in sanctions, defense aid and intelligence. Now the ball is in the partners' court: will they turn these signals into concrete steps — additional sanctions, strengthened intelligence-sharing and new deliveries of defensive equipment?

This is not only a matter of diplomacy — it is a question about the security of Ukrainian society and about how quickly and effectively political declarations can be turned into tangible results for the front and for rebuilding.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026