Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Belgium blocks EU's multi-billion-euro plan for Ukraine

Belgium is blocking an EU plan to provide Ukraine with a loan of up to €140 billion using frozen Russian assets. Prime Minister Bart De Wever said the plan could undermine a future peace agreement and raises legal concerns.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

November 29, 2025 · 2 min read

Belgium blocks EU's multi-billion-euro plan for Ukraine

Ukraine faces a shortfall of funds. The EU wants to use frozen Russian state assets to provide the country with a loan. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz also supports this. However Belgium, where the money is held, still opposes it. 

In Berlin, federal chancellor Friedrich Merz is battling young rebels in his Bundestag parliamentary group, while in the European Union it is the Belgian government that is creating problems for him.

For months the chancellor has insisted on a plan to use frozen Russian assets in the EU via workarounds to provide financial support to Ukraine. However, at the last EU summit no political agreement was reached, mainly due to Belgium's refusal. The country's consent is crucial to the plan, since the assets are held at the Belgian financial institution Euroclear. An agreement must be reached before the EU summit on December 19.

Position of Belgium's prime minister

Whether this will succeed is not yet known. Belgium's prime minister Bart De Wever again reiterated his refusal in a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. According to him, the EU plan could jeopardize a possible peace agreement.

The EU plan envisages granting Ukraine a loan using Russian funds of up to 140 billion euros. Russia would get the money back only if, after the end of its aggressive war against Ukraine, it makes reparations payments. Ukraine urgently needs further financial support.

Arguments against the plan

However, Belgian De Wever remains unconvinced.

"Hurriedly pushing forward the proposed reparations loan will have, as a side effect, that we as the EU will effectively prevent the achievement of a possible peace agreement. The proposed reparations loan, in my view, is fundamentally wrong."

– he wrote in his strongly worded letter.

The Financial Times first reported on the letter.

In the past, De Wever says, immobilized assets were never touched during a war; they were the subject of post-war arrangements. He also warned again that an arbitration court could view the use of frozen Russian funds as an unlawful expropriation, and international investors might lose confidence in the European financial market.

Merz's support

Chancellor Merz on Friday once again called for the use of the frozen assets.

"We want to move forward here as a sign of strength and as a lever to actually bring Moscow to the negotiating table."

– he said.

European Commission's reaction

The European Commission plans to present a legislative proposal soon to dispel Belgium's concerns. According to an EU spokesperson, "intensive talks" are underway on using frozen Russian assets to finance Ukraine. They also include Belgium.

Suspicions regarding Belgium's motives

According to Politico, diplomats from various European countries suspect that Belgium is pursuing hidden self-interests. The country is currently receiving tax revenue from the frozen Russian assets. Reportedly, diplomats point out that Belgium breached an international promise made last year to disclose the use of the tax proceeds. Belgium denies the accusations.

The country is experiencing a budget crisis. Because of a dispute over spending cuts, the governing coalition recently almost collapsed.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026