Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Budanov and Yermak conducted parallel negotiations with Americans — and only one of them knew what Washington thought about him

Bloomberg reveals the mechanics of power shifts in the Presidential Office: while Yermak controlled the official channel of communication with the US, Budanov built his own — and reported to Zelensky how allies actually assessed the previous negotiator.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Budanov and Yermak conducted parallel negotiations with Americans — and only one of them knew what Washington thought about him
Кирило Буданов (Фото: Ceo Club Ukraine)

On April 4, 2026, Bloomberg published an extensive article about Kyrylo Budanov — the new head of the Presidential Office and Ukraine's chief negotiator. According to the agency, he is "sharp, straightforward and somewhat sarcastic" in negotiations — and these very qualities, according to sources, have made him a more effective figure than his predecessor Andriy Yermak.

Two channels — one president

While still heading the GUR, Budanov maintained unofficial contacts with Trump's special envoy Keith Kellogg and Vice President JD Vance's team — parallel to Yermak's official communications. According to Ukrainian Pravda citing sources, Yermak attempted to block these contacts — both directly and through the president.

But it was Budanov who systematically informed Zelenskyy how American partners actually viewed Yermak: they assessed his negotiating style and doubted his ability to do such work. This parallel channel proved decisive — after the corruption scandal in the "Midas" case and the NABU raids in November 2025, Yermak resigned.

A pragmatist amid the ruins of "victory plans"

The negotiating team, formed on January 23, 2026, consists almost entirely of "old" players — only Kyrylo Budanov's close associates David Arakhamia and GUR Deputy Chief Vadym Skibytskyi were added to the Yermak delegation. The Economist in February 2026 documented a split: Budanov's faction advocates for a quick deal under US auspices, Yermak's faction — significantly less optimistic about concessions.

"They all understand that the war must end. That is why they are conducting negotiations. I do not think it will take much time."

Kyrylo Budanov — Bloomberg, April 4, 2026

At the same time, Budanov acknowledged: both sides still adhere to "maximalist" positions. He formulated the stimulus for Russia in pragmatic terms: "Unlike us, they are spending their own money." No specific mechanism for bringing positions closer was mentioned in the public part of the interview.

What Moscow is saying

Bloomberg sources close to the Kremlin assess the situation differently: there is almost no real progress, negotiations have reached a stalemate primarily due to security guarantees for Kyiv. According to them, the only outcome of this year's negotiations is that the sides have outlined positions that are unacceptable to each other. A settlement, in their view, requires a coordinated position between the US and Europe — which does not yet exist.

Next step: Witkoff and Kushner in Kyiv

Budanov announced to Bloomberg that shortly after Easter, a visit by an American delegation led by Special Representative Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner is expected in Kyiv — this will be their first trip to Ukraine. The delegation may include Senator Lindsey Graham. Previously, Witkoff and Kushner visited Moscow several times to negotiate with Putin.

If after this visit the American side does not record a noticeable convergence of positions — an open question remains whether the Trump administration will keep Ukraine as a priority on the peace track, or switch to bilateral deals with Moscow without Kyiv at the table.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026