Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Budanov on possible summit between Zelensky, Trump and Putin: Russia has not yet agreed — what it means for Ukraine

Head of the Presidential Office explains why a tripartite meeting remains necessary, but whether it will take place depends on Moscow's positions and concrete security guarantees.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 1, 2026 · 2 min read

Budanov on possible summit between Zelensky, Trump and Putin: Russia has not yet agreed — what it means for Ukraine
Володимир Путін та Дональд Трамп під час саміту на Алясці у серпні 2025 року (Фото: EPA)

In brief

Head of the President's Office Kyrylo Budanov confirmed in an interview with Ukrainian TV channels that discussions of a summit of the leaders of Ukraine, the US and Russia were on the negotiating table, but Moscow, as of now, did not agree. At the same time, the official does not rule out that the situation may change.

"Possible — that doesn't mean it [the summit] will happen"

— Kyrylo Budanov, head of the President's Office

Why it matters

A trilateral meeting is not an end in itself. For Ukraine it is a chance to set out clear ceasefire mechanisms, security guarantees and a recovery roadmap. At the same time, there is a risk of legitimizing Russian aggression without strict conditions and oversight by international partners.

What is known about timing and positions

The US special envoy made a remark on 19 February about the possibility of a summit within three weeks; after a phone call on 26 February, Zelensky said that the US supports such talks, and the UAE was named as a possible venue in early March. Budanov stressed that this is the current status: opinions are changing quickly.

"But this is as of now. Everybody's views are changing quite quickly these days... We will all be looking for ways for this to happen"

— Kyrylo Budanov, head of the President's Office

Consequences and scenarios

If Moscow agrees — the key question for Ukraine will be not so much the format as the substance: what the timelines will be, verification mechanisms and guarantors of the agreements' implementation. If it refuses — the strategy remains continued international pressure and strengthening defensive positions.

Analysts note: the summit could become a tool to achieve peace, but only with transparent guarantees and the participation of reliable partners in overseeing implementation of the agreements.

Conclusion

Today the key issue is not the headline of a summit, but whether diplomatic signals will be turned into concrete guarantees for Ukraine's security. Whether our partners can provide such conditions — the real benefit of future talks will depend on that.

"We will not back away from it"

— Kyrylo Budanov, head of the President's Office

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026