Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

CBS: Trump Approved Strikes Against Venezuela — What It Means for U.S. Security Policy and Regional Stability

According to CBS, the decision to carry out the strikes was made several days before the operation. That raises questions about Congressional oversight, the Pentagon’s priorities, and the potential geopolitical consequences — we break it down step by step.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 3, 2026 · 2 min read

CBS: Trump Approved Strikes Against Venezuela — What It Means for U.S. Security Policy and Regional Stability

In brief

Channel CBS News, citing unnamed sources, reported that U.S. President Donald Trump approved air strikes on targets in Venezuela several days before the operation actually began on the night of January 3. There were no official comments from the White House or the Pentagon at the time of publication.

"U.S. President Donald Trump ordered strikes on targets in Venezuela early on Saturday morning."

— CBS News, citing unnamed sources

What is known and why it matters

According to reports, the military had planned the mission even for Christmas, but postponed it — partly because of the U.S.'s priority strikes on ISIS positions in Nigeria. This gives an insight into how the Pentagon sets priorities: operational flexibility and the ability to rapidly redeploy resources sometimes take precedence over planned actions.

"The U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee was not informed in advance of any potential military action in Venezuela."

— CNN, citing an unnamed source

If this information is confirmed, it raises questions about control over decisions to use force: how much do the president's operational decisions align with congressional oversight, and what political risks does this create for the administration.

Consequences for the region and beyond

The strikes in Venezuela's capital, reported as explosions and partial blackouts in Caracas, have several simultaneous effects: they increase tensions in Latin America, create a precedent for interventions outside Iraq/Syria, and test the reactions of international actors, notably Russia and China. For Ukraine, this is a reminder: partners can make rapid forceful decisions outside traditional theaters of operation — this affects global power alignments and diplomatic priorities.

What to watch next

- Whether the White House and the Pentagon will confirm the attribution and scale of the strikes. - Whether Congress will launch an investigation or hearings regarding notification and jurisdiction. - How regional players and international partners (including Russia and China) will react, which could determine further escalation or diplomatic pressure.

This is a story not only about one night and not only about Latin America — it is a signal about how Washington's military-political priorities are being formed under new conditions. The response of Congress, the positions of allies, and the Pentagon's next steps will determine whether this remains an isolated action or turns into a longer-term strategy.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026