Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Red Lines: Thin and Not-So-Thin

The concept of the "red line" originates from the Battle of Balaclava in 1854, when the 93rd Scottish Regiment halted a Russian attack. A thin line of riflemen in red uniforms became the symbol of the final line of defense in international politics.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 6, 2025 · 2 min read

Red Lines: Thin and Not-So-Thin

The current attempts by Moscow and Beijing to reshape the world order in their favor have triggered a whole avalanche of consultations and negotiations, and accordingly have brought the concept of "red lines" back into active use in international political discourse.

It's time to remember where the concept of the "red line" comes from.

"Thin red line" - the thin red line

Battle of Balaclava

On 25 October 1854, during the Crimean War, the troops of tsarist Russia tried to cut off supplies to the British forces preparing for the siege of Sevastopol. An attack by the Muscovites near Sapun Hill against the positions of the Turkish troops allied with the British was successful, and the situation of the English and French units became critical.

The situation was saved by the 93rd Regiment of Scottish Highland infantry under the command of baronet Colin Campbell. Campbell understood that, by regulation and to ensure the required density of fire, the firing formation of the riflemen should have been four deep — but in that case the regiment would not have enough frontage and an attack by the Muscovite cavalry might succeed.

Campbell rearranged his Scots into two lines. It was risky, but it worked. The Russians could not break through, although the line of riflemen in red uniforms was indeed thin. The Times newspaper, in its report on the battle, used this expression for the first time — "thin red line", or "тонка червона лінія".

Transformation of the meaning

The expression is still used in the sense of "the last line of defense", especially in the context of personnel shortages. But in general its usage has widened — in the context of international relations it now means the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable conditions.

It should be noted: the people who today shape the international policy of the modern collective West often lack the steadfastness of the fighters of Her Majesty's 93rd Highland Infantry Regiment. The red line of Baron Campbell's brave highlanders, despite indeed being thin, proved an insurmountable obstacle for the Muscovites.

PS

The British then laid a railway from Balaclava to their positions near Sevastopol for supplies, which gave the allies a great logistical advantage. It was the first railway on the territory of modern Ukraine. But that's another story.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026