Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Why an outright ban on Russian in schools could create new lines of division — the Ministry of Education's stance

The deputy minister of education emphasizes: bans rarely unite. Support and gradual Ukrainization are about security and statehood, not repression. We explain why radical measures can work against their objective.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Why an outright ban on Russian in schools could create new lines of division — the Ministry of Education's stance
Надія Кузьмичова (Фото: facebook.com/nadiia.penkova)

Context: language as a matter of security and statehood

Instead of a total ban on the Russian language in schools, the Ministry of Education proposes a consistent strategy to establish Ukrainian. This is not only a cultural issue — this is a matter of statehood and security, reminds Deputy Minister of Education and Science Nadiya Kuzmychova. What should everyone who cares about the next generation know?

Risks of radical bans

Kuzmychova warns: a total ban can create new lines of division and, in the long term, weaken rather than strengthen the position of the Ukrainian language. Radical decisions often provoke rejection, reinforce similar reactions within families and communities, and complicate children's integration into the educational environment.

"Our task is not to create new lines of division, but to steadily and confidently strengthen the position of Ukrainian as the sole language of education, supporting children in their transition to it"

— Nadiya Kuzmychova, Deputy Minister of Education and Science

Why a gradual approach works better

Language policy based on support and the creation of a comfortable environment has a higher likelihood of sustainable success. This means updated textbooks, professional support for teachers, programs for parents and extracurricular initiatives that make Ukrainian natural and practical for children, rather than an imposed norm.

What experts and international experience say

The expert community and international recommendations on language policy indicate that policies combining educational transformation with social support yield longer-lasting results than bans. This strengthens the state's position without increasing internal tensions.

Minister of Education Oksen Lisovyi also emphasized that part of the problem is adult education: if society does not grasp the cause-and-effect relationships, work with parents and communities should become a priority.

Conclusion — a practical forecast

If the state chooses a strategy of supporting the Ukrainian language through education, resources and communication, the Ukrainization of the school environment will be a sustainable process. If, however, the path of total bans is chosen, the risk of political and social alienation increases — and then the goal will be under threat. A question for leadership and society: do we seek unity through strengthening, or do we risk division through bans?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026