Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Davos for Ukraine: Zelensky’s talk with Trump bolstered air defenses and shifted diplomatic logistics

In an interview with LIGA.net, the president discussed negotiations over PAC-3 missiles, anticipated security guarantees, and trilateral talks in the Emirates — we explain what this means for the country's defense and finances.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 23, 2026 · 2 min read

Davos for Ukraine: Zelensky’s talk with Trump bolstered air defenses and shifted diplomatic logistics

Briefly — why this matters

The meeting of the presidents in Davos gave Ukraine not an emotional boost but concrete working agreements: discussion of additional PAC‑3 missiles to counter ballistic threats, the completion of negotiations on security guarantees, and agreement on the format of trilateral talks. These are not instant fixes, but important steps toward real strengthening of defense capability and diplomatic progress.

What the President said

Volodymyr Zelensky, in response to a question from LIGA.net, confirmed that additional air-defense missiles, including PAC‑3, were discussed during the conversation with Donald Trump. The President also expects the signing of a document on security guarantees and reported agreement on meetings of technical trilateral groups.

"We discussed difficult issues that concern the east of our country and the end of the war. It is important that a decision was made that the technical trilateral groups will meet... after that there will be a trilateral meeting of our negotiators in the Emirates"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

EU financial support and criticism of sanctions

The President thanked the EU for a credit package of 90 billion euros, which, he said, amounts to roughly 45 billion euros per year over the next two years. At the same time, Zelensky pointed to gaps in sanctions against the Russian Federation — in particular regarding the nuclear sector and Rosatom’s activities — and called for firmer steps.

"Let's be honest: Russia's nuclear sector. Sanctions still haven't been applied against the nuclear sector, against Rosatom, etc. There are no strong sanctions so far... Therefore, there are decisions that need to be taken very quickly — our own air defense, increasing the production of weapons"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

What this means in practice

1) Increasing air-defense deliveries (PAC‑3) is a technical but critically needed element of the defense strategy: it reduces the vulnerability of civilian infrastructure and raises the cost of attacks for the adversary.

2) The trilateral format (USA — Ukraine — Russia) within the Emirates offers a chance for technical coordination on key issues, but its effectiveness will depend on the parties' willingness to compromise and on oversight by international guarantors.

3) European financing makes economic resilience more realistic, but sanctions policy remains a painful element — without tougher restrictions certain security risks and deterrence gaps will persist.

Context and next steps

Analysts note that diplomacy increasingly works through technical working groups and supply logistics rather than individual public gestures. Now it is up to partners — they must turn the agreements into concrete contracts, delivery schedules, and legal instruments to pressure the aggressor.

The remaining question: will allies be able to accelerate both the delivery of defensive systems and the implementation of more effective sanctions so the agreements reached become actionable in the coming months?

Source: conversation of the President of Ukraine with LIGA.net in Davos.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026