Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"The State Has Learned to Say Goodbye Without a Body: What the New Law Changes for Families of the Missing"

Ukraine's Parliament adopted a law that for the first time allows a full military funeral ceremony — complete with volleys, flag honors, and the "Pochvala" (a ceremonial tribute) — when a soldier is declared killed by court but his body has not been found. Previously, military regulations did not provide for such a possibility.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 2 min read

"The State Has Learned to Say Goodbye Without a Body: What the New Law Changes for Families of the Missing"
Національне військове меморіальне кладовище (Візуалізація - Мінветеранів)

Until May 14, 2025, Ukrainian military law knew only one form of farewell — burial or reburial. If there was no body, there was no official procedure to say goodbye with dignity. Law No. 15029, which was voted for by 273 people's deputies, closes this gap.

What exactly changed

The Charter of Garrison and Guard Services of the Armed Forces has been supplemented with a new article 81-1. It introduces a separate procedure — a military farewell ritual — for military personnel whom a court has declared dead in the absence of a body. This is a legally distinct category from ordinary burial: a person is officially dead by court decision, but remains are absent.

The ceremony is tied to a cenotaph — a symbolic grave. It is there that the state flag is unfurled, the signal "Honor" is performed, three volleys of blank ammunition are fired, and the flag is solemnly handed over to relatives with an established verbal formula. The flag is then kept by the family as a relic — it is not returned to the state.

Who decides and how the decision is made

The initiative rests with the relatives or close friends of the deceased. If there are none, the decision can be made by the garrison commander, the head of the territorial recruitment center, or the head of the local state administration. In other words, the state can conduct the ritual without the family's consent — if there simply is no family left.

"The document was developed to regulate matters concerning the rendering of military honors to persons who defended the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, among those declared dead by a court."

Press Service of the Verkhovna Rada

The scale of the problem the law solves

Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko initiated the draft law. The public search database Ukpovis records over 2,700 military personnel listed as missing in action — and this is only those whose families filed search notices. The actual number is much higher: some of the missing may be in captivity, some may have died without the possibility of body identification. It is precisely for this latter group that the judicial procedure of declaring someone dead becomes the only legal tool — and now a state ceremony is added to it.

What the law does not resolve

The ritual is a symbolic act, not a legal status. It does not expedite the judicial procedure for declaring someone dead, does not simplify families' access to payments, and does not replace the work of body identification. Between the court decision and actual farewell, families go through a separate, often exhausting path through courts and military structures — the law does not address this part.

The question is whether families will receive real support in going through the judicial procedure, without which the new ritual is simply inaccessible — or will the law remain a right on paper for those who already know how to use it.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026