Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Civil servants gained freedom of movement — but not everyone: what the Cabinet changed

# Government Gradually Lifts Restrictions on Female Officials' Foreign Travel The government is gradually removing restrictions on female state officials' travel abroad. Following local deputies in autumn 2025, the restrictions are now being lifted for a broader circle of civil servants. The logic behind this approach is based on separating "replaceable" positions from those critical to the functioning of the state apparatus.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Civil servants gained freedom of movement — but not everyone: what the Cabinet changed
Жінка (Фото: DepositPhotos)

A rank-and-file city council specialist and a minister are both formally "female officials." However, until this week, both operated under identical martial law restrictions on crossing the border. The Cabinet of Ministers recognized this equality as excessive.

What the government decided

The Cabinet of Ministers canceled restrictions on exit for female employees of state authorities, local governments, state enterprises, and other designated institutions. Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko announced the decision. Restrictions remain only for the highest state officials and heads of key government bodies — those whose absence directly affects the continuity of state operations.

"To ensure the continuous operation of the state" — this is exactly how the Cabinet explains the preservation of exit restrictions for senior leadership.

Glavkom

How this happened in stages

The current decision is not a sudden move. According to Glavkom, back in September 2025, the Cabinet lifted the ban on female deputies of local councils — regional, city, district, municipal, and village councils (except those who are local government officials). The current decision extends liberalization to a much broader circle.

In parallel, starting March 2026, simplified exit procedures for conscripted men came into effect — meaning the easing of movement restrictions is happening systematically, not in isolated cases.

Why restrictions existed for women in the first place

Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, women in Ukraine have not been subject to the general exit ban. However, as lawyer Yaroslav Khlivnyi explained in comments to RBC-Ukraine, separate categories — holders of government positions, heads of central authorities, and their deputies — faced special restrictions. The logic: not mobilization-based, but administrative — to protect the state apparatus from staffing gaps at a critical moment.

  • Female military personnel under contract are equated with conscripted men — restrictions remain in place for them.
  • Senior state leadership — ministers, heads of central bodies — are not covered by the new decision.
  • A broad circle of mid-level and lower-ranking civil servants — now have the freedom to cross the border without additional permission.

In effect, the government drew a distinction between positions essential to state functioning and the rest — and lifted restrictions precisely from the "rest." The question that remains open: where is the line between a "key government body" and an ordinary state enterprise — and who determines this line and by what criteria, if tomorrow the list of "key" bodies suddenly expands.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026