Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

20,000 UAH bonuses for restoration crews: how this will speed up the return of electricity, heating and water

From January through March, each worker in emergency-restoration crews will receive 20,000 hryvnias — a move intended to reduce downtime of utility services and speed up repairs after shelling.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 23, 2026 · 2 min read

20,000 UAH bonuses for restoration crews: how this will speed up the return of electricity, heating and water

What was adopted and when it will take effect

President Volodymyr Zelensky announced a monthly supplement of UAH 20,000 for workers involved in emergency restoration work after Russian shelling. Supplements are provided for January, February and March — UAH 20,000 for each month; the first payments for January will arrive in February.

Who it concerns

According to the government, the support covers workers at enterprises of all forms of ownership, including the fuel and energy sector, housing and utilities and employees of Ukrzaliznytsia — from foremen to rank‑and‑file specialists who directly carry out restoration work.

"Every worker who is involved in emergency restoration work will receive a supplement of UAH 20,000. For January, February and March of this year. For each month — UAH 20,000,"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

How the mechanism will work

Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko and the First Deputy Prime Minister — Minister of Energy Denys Shmyhal agreed on a simple digital procedure: a single register of enterprises will be created, they will submit online applications with lists of employees, each person will be notified via Diia or SMS, and funds will be transferred to existing bank accounts in the month following the completed work.

"The government approved a resolution to launch an experimental project to support emergency repair crews who restore electricity, heat and water to Ukrainian homes and enterprises,"

— Denys Shmyhal, Minister of Energy

Why this matters to you

This decision has two practical goals: first, to retain and motivate skilled crews to work in extreme conditions; and second, to reduce the time to restore critical services, which directly affects the safety and daily life of citizens. The faster power and heat are restored — the lower the risk of social problems and costs for the state and businesses.

Context of risks and the need for rapid solutions

On January 22 the Ministry of Internal Affairs urged people to keep basic supplies for 3–5 days due to risks to the energy system. Shmyhal himself called January 22 one of the hardest days for the energy system since the 2022 blackout — an indicator that the policy of supporting crews has an operational rationale, not just a social effect.

What’s next

The decision has already been made; the key question is the speed and transparency of implementation. If the system and digital procedures operate without glitches, the supplements could become a clear tool for mitigating the effects of shelling and a leap in the ability to promptly restore infrastructure. If not — the benefit will be limited by bureaucracy and delays.

Analysts and industry representatives emphasize: this is an experiment that needs to be rapidly scaled and monitored for results — time to restore services and preserved human resources will be the best measures of effectiveness.

Brief conclusion

This is a simple but targeted step — an investment in the human resources that directly bring normal life back to communities after attacks. Now it is important that the mechanism works quickly, transparently and with a focus on results: fewer days without power and heat — fewer risks for people and the economy.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026