Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Drone attack on Dnipro: 16-story building partially destroyed, people injured

Russian drones struck a residential building in Dnipro — what is known about the casualties, the rescuers’ actions, and the broader context of the attack.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 22, 2026 · 1 min read

Drone attack on Dnipro: 16-story building partially destroyed, people injured

What happened

Russian drones struck the residential sector of Dnipro during the night: according to the State Emergency Service (SES), a 16-story building was partially destroyed, and fires broke out in two apartments covering a total area of about 200 m².

"The Russians attacked Dnipro with drones — there is destruction in an apartment building, and people have been injured."

— State Emergency Service (SES)

Rescue operations and the injured

Rescuers managed to evacuate 16 people from the upper floors of the building. Preliminary data indicate 14 people were injured. Among them is a 14-year-old girl (no threat to life), as well as a 64-year-old woman and an 88-year-old man, who are in moderate condition, reported the head of the regional state administration, Oleksandr Hanzha.

"More than 50 rescuers and 17 pieces of equipment are working to address the aftermath; emergency psychological assistance and warming stations have been deployed for residents."

— Oleksandr Hanzha, head of the regional state administration

Broader context

The SES also reported that on the night of January 22 the Odesa, Dnipropetrovsk and Chernihiv regions were struck. During the day of the same date, Kryvyi Rih was hit by a missile strike — there are also casualties and damage there. Such synchronization of attacks fits a pattern noted by security experts: the combination of drones and missile strikes is intended to spread panic and to stretch emergency services' resources.

What’s next

Local services are responding quickly: saving lives and minimizing humanitarian consequences is the priority. At the same time, this attack again raises questions about strengthening air defenses and supporting civilian infrastructure. The response of communities and the state must be twofold: rapid medical and psychological assistance for the injured and systemic support to prevent similar incidents in the future.

While rescuers work to eliminate the aftermath, it is important to follow official announcements from the State Emergency Service and local authorities and not to spread unverified information.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026