Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Drones struck Europe's largest sulfuric acid producer — and it's not just a chemical plant

JSC "Apatit" in Cherepovets produces raw materials for fertilizers and ammunition simultaneously. Five wounded and an acid leak are the consequences of an attack that the governor initially called "without damage."

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Drones struck Europe's largest sulfuric acid producer — and it's not just a chemical plant
Попередня атака на завод "Апатит" у березні 2026 року (Фото: Exilenova+)

On the night of March 27, Ukrainian drones attacked two major industrial facilities in Russia simultaneously — a chemical plant in Cherepovets (Vologda region) and an oil refinery in Yaroslavl. The scale of the targets goes far beyond "another routine strike."

Cherepovets: more than just a "fertilizer plant"

Cherepovets is home to the enterprise JSC "Apatit" — according to the company itself, Europe's largest manufacturer of phosphorus-containing fertilizers, phosphoric and sulfuric acids, as well as one of Russia's leading producers of ammonium nitrate. That same ammonium nitrate is used in the production of explosives for ammunition.

Vologda region Governor Georgy Filimonov initially claimed there were no casualties and no damage to critical infrastructure. In reality, according to MarketScreener citing PhosAgro, five people were wounded, and a sulfuric acid leak occurred. The company assured that the leak was "localized and no emissions of hazardous substances occurred."

"When drones destroy both production and transshipment terminals — the entire industrial northwest of Russia falls into a coma."

Sergiy Misyura, military analyst at Armiya TV

The logic of the strike becomes clearer when considering the context: over 70% of "Apatit's" products were previously shipped through terminals in Ust-Luga — a port that also came under attack. Striking both the manufacturer and the sales channel simultaneously — this is no coincidence.

Yaroslavl: a plant that already burned

The oil refinery in Yaroslavl — Slavneft-YANOS — is located over 700 kilometers from the Ukrainian border, which had long been considered a safe distance. As RBC-Ukraine reports, this is not the first strike: the plant was attacked in January 2024 and December 2025.

Yaroslavl region Governor Mikhail Evraev reported intercepting over 30 drones without specifying damage details. Video footage from the scene circulating on social media showed a fire on the refinery territory.

What this means for Russian exports

According to UAWire, Russia's oil exports have already declined by 40% due to systematic strikes on oil infrastructure. Add to this strikes on the chemical industry — a source of foreign currency not covered by oil sanctions — and the picture becomes clear: Ukraine is consistently attacking the nodes where Russia makes money to continue the war.

  • "Apatit" — sulfuric acid, phosphoric fertilizers, ammonium nitrate (dual use: agriculture + defense industry)
  • Slavneft-YANOS — one of Central Russia's key refineries
  • Ust-Luga — the main terminal for chemical exports from Russia's Northwest

No official confirmation came from Ukrainian military — this is standard practice for deep rear strikes.

If Ukraine continues to simultaneously strike chemical export production capacities and logistics, Russia will either redirect currency flows through other channels — or face a real shortage of raw materials for its own defense industry. The question is whether "Apatit" will manage to restore capacity before the logistics hub in Ust-Luga becomes operational again.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026