Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Air Assault Forces in the south: over 300 sq km and eight settlements liberated on the Oleksandrivka axis

The Air Assault Forces, together with neighboring units, repelled attacks, regained control over territories and are pushing back the occupiers — why this is important for the security of the Dnipropetrovsk region.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Air Assault Forces in the south: over 300 sq km and eight settlements liberated on the Oleksandrivka axis
Ілюстративне фото: ДШВ

Operation and its essence

The Air Assault Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are conducting offensive operations on the Oleksandrivka direction. According to the command, since the start of the operation units, together with adjacent forces, have cleared sabotage-and-reconnaissance groups and restored control over more than 300 km² of territory and 8 populated localities. This is part of efforts to disrupt the enemy's plans for further advance toward the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia regions.

"Overall, the situation can be described as very dynamic. The enemy clings to every metre... but despite their resistance, the units are fulfilling assigned tasks and are liberating native land step by step."

— Command of the Air Assault Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

What is known

Officially: the AAF command confirms successful offensive actions and repelled enemy counterattacks. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on 20 February also reported the liberation of about 300 km² in the south. The Ukrainian project DeepState records a reduction in occupied territory and an increase in the grey zone in the direction, although maps are updated with a delay.

The spokesman for the Southern Defence Forces in an interview with LIGA.net noted that one factor of success was operational circumstances around communications (in particular, Russian blocking of Starlink is mentioned as one factor), however the command emphasizes that the outcome is influenced by a combination of measures, equipment and the training of personnel.

Why this matters

The Oleksandrivka direction is a transitional zone where Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia regions meet. Holding and gradually destroying enemy groupings here limits their routes for advancing deeper into Dnipropetrovsk region, complicates logistics and allows formation of more advantageous positions for further operations. Analysts note that even local successes on such nodal sections can shift the tactical balance along hundreds of kilometres of the front.

Limitations and warnings

The AAF command stresses that the active phase of the operation is ongoing, so it is too early to speak of final results. Estimates of area and controlled localities may be refined as advances continue and data are confirmed.

"However, as long as the active phase of the operation continues, it is somewhat premature to speak of its final results."

— Command of the Air Assault Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

What next

This is an important tactical move — but to turn temporary gains into a sustainable strategic result requires logistical support, artillery cover and continued reconnaissance. International partners also play a role: equipment and intelligence increase the chances of consolidating gains. The question for the next stage is whether these positions can be held and gradually turned into a stable line that will complicate any new attempts by the enemy to advance.

Sources: official statements of the AAF command, statement of the President of Ukraine (20.02), analytical project DeepState, interview with the spokesman of the Southern Defence Forces for LIGA.net.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026