Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Fake Masquerading as CBC: How Russian Propaganda Uses the Olympics to Discredit Ukrainian Athletes

The Center for Countering Disinformation recorded a fabricated television report assembled from CBC footage and voiced by an AI-generated voice. This is no coincidence — the attack on Ukraine’s reputation during the Games has a clear purpose.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Fake Masquerading as CBC: How Russian Propaganda Uses the Olympics to Discredit Ukrainian Athletes

What happened and why it matters

The Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD) recorded another information attack against the backdrop of the XXV Winter Olympic Games in Italy. Russian outlets circulated a fabricated TV report presented as material from the Canadian broadcaster CBC. Tampered footage and an artificial voice created the illusion that Ukrainian athletes had been deliberately moved because of their “inadequate behavior” — claims that are not mentioned at all in the original CBC piece.

How the fake worked

According to the CCD, propagandists used a real CBC video clip, replaced parts of the footage and overlaid an artificially generated voice imitating a journalist. That combination — real visual cues plus a trustworthy-sounding voiceover — makes the fake more convincing to a broad audience.

"This report is a falsification. In the original CBC material the journalist does not mention Ukraine or Ukrainian athletes"

— Center for Countering Disinformation

Why they do it

The Olympic Games are an event with heightened media and public attention, so any disinformation has the potential to spread quickly. According to experts in countering disinformation, the goal of such operations is to undermine international support for Ukraine by discrediting its citizens and athletes in the international media space. Using an external brand (CBC) and technologies (AI voiceover) gives the fake visual and vocal legitimacy.

"Such forgeries work on reputation: when a source looks familiar, people check information less"

— expert in countering disinformation (anonymous for safety)

Facts about the performances of Ukrainian athletes

While political manipulations spread online, our athletes continue to compete on the slopes and tracks: Annamari Dancha did not advance to the 1/8 finals in snowboarding, Anastasiia Shepilenko finished 32nd in alpine skiing, and the biathlon team placed 8th in the mixed relay. These results are dry facts that need no speculation and are more important than informational provocations.

What to do next

This case is a reminder for the public and partners: check sources, do not share materials without verification, and support the work of fact-checkers. For the state and sports organizations it is a signal to strengthen communication and digital hygiene during mass events. Technical tools (video verification, audio analysis) and diplomatic complaints against distributors are priority steps in response.

Conclusion

This fake is part of a systematic campaign of discreditation. It does not change the athletes’ actual results, but it can affect perceptions of Ukraine abroad. The question is not whether we can debunk a single clip — the question is about systematic work by our partners and the media space so that such manipulations do not become a source of trust for an international audience.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026