Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Fico Flies to Moscow via Georgia: How NATO's Three-Country Ban Doubled Flight Time

Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have closed their airspace to the Slovak Prime Minister's plane — and he is once again, as a year ago, seeking an alternative route via the Black Sea. The difference: this time he is flying to the 80th "Victory Parade," which is not officially listed in his schedule.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Fico Flies to Moscow via Georgia: How NATO's Three-Country Ban Doubled Flight Time
Володимир Путін та Роберт Фіцо (Фото: EPA)

Robert Fico is flying to Moscow on May 9 for the second year in a row. And for the second year in a row, three NATO countries—Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia—are closing their airspace to him. But while in 2024 this looked like a precedent, in 2025 it is already a procedure.

A route that reveals everything

Normally, a flight from Bratislava to Moscow takes about 2.5 hours—through Lithuanian airspace, which after the Ryanair incident in Belarus in 2021 became the standard corridor for European flights to Russia. This time, Fico is flying via Hungary, Romania, the Black Sea, and Georgia—a route that costs him an additional 2.5 hours in the air and, apparently, significantly more aviation fuel at the expense of Slovak taxpayers.

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda confirmed to Reuters that the country has closed its airspace to Fico's flights and to Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić. Latvia and Estonia acted similarly, citing the "political sensitivity of the flight's destination."

"A parade" that is not on the agenda

The official program of the visit, published by the Slovak government, does not include participation in the military parade in Red Square. Fico stated that he is going to lay flowers at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier near the Kremlin walls and conduct bilateral meetings with Putin, Xi Jinping, and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

"Lithuania and Latvia have already informed us that they will not allow flights through their territory on the way to Moscow. But I will find another route."

Robert Fico, Facebook video address

Exactly what he said a year ago.

Kaja versus Fico: a dispute over sovereignty

EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas made it clear that participation in Moscow events is incompatible with the EU's position. Fico responded sharply:

"Is Ms. Kallas's warning blackmail? It is now 2025, not 1939. No one can tell me where I have the right to travel."

Robert Fico

Formally, he is right: there is no legal mechanism that would prohibit an EU country's leader from flying to Russia. Closing airspace is the only tool that neighbors have used.

Vučić solved the problem via Azerbaijan

The Serbian president faced the same problem and chose a similar workaround—via Azerbaijan. The principle is the same: if the direct route is closed, there is a longer one. Flight bans create inconvenience, but not an obstacle.

  • 29 foreign leaders are announced for the parade in Moscow, including Xi Jinping
  • Fico and Vučić are the only representatives from countries with EU agreements or membership
  • 5 hours—Fico's flight time via the detour route instead of the usual 2.5

Meanwhile, Moscow uses each such arrival as a signal: the sanctions front is not monolithic. Fico understands this—and that is precisely why he is flying.

The question is not whether Fico will arrive. He will. The question is whether a specific mechanism in EU law will emerge afterward—for example, temporary suspension of voting in the Council—or whether closing the skies will remain the only response that allies can give to a leader who is demonstratively flying to an aggressor country for the second year in a row.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026