Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Fico threatens to block €90 billion for Ukraine — what it means for security and the budget

The Slovak prime minister ties the refusal to transit oil to the power to block an EU loan. We examine how political pressure on the "Druzhba" pipeline could affect funding for Ukraine's defense and economy right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 8, 2026 · 2 min read

Fico threatens to block €90 billion for Ukraine — what it means for security and the budget
Роберт Фіцо (Фото: Dominika Kortvelyesiova/EPA)

What happened

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said in a video address that Bratislava may follow Hungary and block a €90 billion financial support package for Ukraine. He links this to Kyiv’s decision to halt the transit of Russian oil through the "Druzhba" pipeline and is critical of the actions of the Ukrainian authorities.

"The €90 billion loan from the EU is supposedly not a loan, but an ordinary gift"

— Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Slovakia

Why this matters for Ukraine

This is not just a diplomatic spat. Blocking at the level of national governments threatens regular financing that covers both social spending and procurement for the defence sector. For every Ukrainian, this is a question of budget stability and the state's ability to withstand the burdens of war.

Context: "Druzhba", supplies and alternatives

Budapest and Bratislava claim the "Druzhba" pipeline is undamaged and point to satellite imagery. Kyiv, however, says repair crews are being shelled, so restoring transit now is too risky. In response, Hungary and Slovakia have already restricted diesel exports to Ukraine; Bratislava has also temporarily halted emergency electricity supplies.

Kyiv has offered partner governments alternative supply routes that do not depend on Russian feedstock, but the issue remains politically sensitive.

Diplomatic dimension and the EU response

On March 10 Fico is due to meet in Paris with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, where he plans to insist on access to the site of the damage and to present his own technical arguments. In Brussels, officials are seeking mechanisms that would reduce the influence of one or two capitals on pan-European aid — a "Plan B" on financing has already been written about by LIGA.net and other outlets.

"Slovakia is ready to take over the baton from Hungary, if needed"

— Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Slovakia

What will change and options for Ukraine

There are several scenarios: diplomatic concessions (partial restoration of transit or independent inspections), political bargaining ahead of elections in Hungary, or finding procedures in Brussels that minimize individual countries' veto power. For Ukraine it is important to work on two fronts — to demonstrate the technical justification for its decisions and simultaneously seek guarantees of funding that are independent of unilateral blockages.

Conclusion

Fico’s statements are a pressure tool that combines energy vulnerability with political aims. Analysts note that the key issue is not only the technical condition of the "Druzhba" pipeline, but whether these statements will turn into actual blocks on funding. The ball is now with partners in the EU: will they be able to decouple the necessary aid from the political calculations of individual capitals?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026