Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

GPS Jamming as Protocol: Second British Defense Minister Returns from Estonia Without Navigation

On May 21, a Royal Air Force aircraft carrying John Healey lost GPS signal for three hours. This is not the first such incident — and it is the very repetition that transforms the incident into a documented strategy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 25, 2026 · 2 min read

GPS Jamming as Protocol: Second British Defense Minister Returns from Estonia Without Navigation
Джон Гілі (Фото: Andy Rain / EPA)

On May 21, when British Defense Minister John Healey was flying home from Estonia — where he was observing NATO exercises near the Russian border — a Royal Air Force Dassault Falcon 900LX aircraft lost GPS navigation for three hours. The pilots switched to a backup system. Passengers, including journalists and photographers, were told that safety was not at risk.

The flight route was available in real-time on public tracking websites. Whether the aircraft was an intentional target remains unknown.

Not the First Time and Not by Chance

In March 2024, the same happened to the previous British Defense Minister Grant Shapps: his aircraft experienced spoofing — coordinate falsification — near Kaliningrad. In September 2025, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's aircraft was forced to land using paper maps due to GPS interference over Bulgaria.

"This is irresponsible Russian interference, but the Royal Air Force is well-prepared for such activity"

— source in the British Defense Ministry, The Times

According to Euronews, citing a letter from May 2025, ministers from 13 EU countries have documented that GPS jamming in the Baltic Sea region has been conducted since 2022, primarily from Russia and Belarus, with the number of aircraft incidents sharply increasing after August 2024. Lithuania registered over 1,000 cases of interference in June — 22 times more than a year earlier. Latvia recorded 820 cases in 2024 compared to 26 in 2022.

Where the Signal Comes From

According to David Staplles, professor of electronic and radio engineering at City University London, Russia has jamming bases in Kaliningrad and along the borders with Baltic countries — regions with heavy concentrations of electronic warfare units. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called such actions part of a "comprehensive campaign" with potentially catastrophic consequences.

How Dangerous Is It Really

GPS jamming is critical in three scenarios: poor weather, nighttime, and dense airspace. According to aviation safety expert Teg Westbrook, such a combination of circumstances occurs in less than 1% of flights — but that is precisely when the consequences could be most severe. The Swedish Maritime Administration has already officially warned sailors to switch to radar and landmarks instead of satellite navigation. Finland is developing a device to counter jamming.

Russia officially explains the interference as protection of its own infrastructure from Ukrainian drones. Bulgaria's prime minister, after the incident with von der Leyen, called the jamming a "side effect of war." However, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, and Germany have officially classified such actions as a form of hybrid warfare.

The question is no longer whether Russia is jamming GPS over the Baltic — it is a documented fact. The question is at how many incidents involving NATO civilian or government aircraft will NATO transition from statements to a technical response — including the deployment of alternative navigation systems that do not depend on satellite signals.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026