Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Galati, 220 evacuated and a drone with explosives: How NATO still hasn't closed the sky over the Danube

A Russian unmanned aerial vehicle crashed in a residential area of the Romanian city of Galati and was found to be equipped with explosives. This is not the first incident in the same area — but air defense systems are still only being tested there.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Galati, 220 evacuated and a drone with explosives: How NATO still hasn't closed the sky over the Danube
Евакуація у румунському місті Галац після падіння дрона 25 квітня (Фото: скриншот з відео)

At night in Galati, a strike was heard — not against Ukraine, but against Romania. A Russian drone fell in the residential neighborhood of Bariera-Trayana, and when sappers approached closer, it turned out: the unmanned aircraft was carrying explosives. 220 people were evacuated, the neighborhood was cordoned off with a 200-meter radius perimeter, and police, gendarmes, and rescue services were deployed.

A Repeating Route

Galati is a port city on the Danube, a few kilometers from Odesa region. It is along the Danube that Russian kamikaze drones most often deviate or get lost after attacks on Ukrainian port facilities. According to Gordon UA, wreckage from unmanned aircraft in Romania is being recorded increasingly often — and this incident in Galati is not the first: local residents have already reported objects falling in the same area during previous attacks.

According to Defense Post, in recent months alone Romania has scrambled fighter jets several times — sometimes F-16s, sometimes British RAF Eurofighter Typhoons — to track intruders. But not a single drone over Romanian territory has been shot down: either it managed to leave airspace, or the order to strike did not arrive in time.

Law Exists — System Does Not

In May 2025, Romania finally passed a law allowing its armed forces to shoot down unmanned aircraft that illegally cross the border. But the existence of a legal norm and actual capability to act are different things.

"Almost every week we scramble aircraft into the air — either ours or our German partners'"

Romania's Ministry of Defense, September 2025

The answer to this gap is the Merops system, an AI interceptor from Project Eagle, supported by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. According to Defense Minister Radu Miruca, after two weeks of testing under NATO auspices at a base near the Black Sea, the system was supposed to come on duty "within days." The main goal of deployment is precisely the Danube. But while Merops was being tested, a drone with explosives was already lying in a Galati courtyard.

What This Means for NATO

Galati is not some remote border outpost — it is a city with a population of over 200,000 people, a major shipbuilding center. Evacuating a neighborhood because of a combat drone on the street is not "debris," it is an incident of a different level of threat. As noted by Al Arabiya English, Romania has not yet shot down a drone in peacetime, although the law now allows it.

  • Romania borders Ukraine for 650 km — the longest land border among NATO countries on this flank
  • Airspace violations have also been recorded by Moldova, Poland, and the Baltic states
  • The EU, according to Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius, is "not ready" for a massive drone attack

The question is not whether Merops will appear over the Danube — it will. The question is whether Romania will manage to deploy actual patrols by the next night, when Russia attacks Odesa again and another drone goes off course over a residential neighborhood.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026