Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

General who occupied Crimea died over Crimea — 12 years later

Oleksandr Otroshchenko participated in the annexation of the peninsula in 2014, commanded the Black Sea Fleet aviation during the occupation — and died in the same place where he began. The details of the catastrophe have still not been officially disclosed.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 6, 2026 · 3 min read

General who occupied Crimea died over Crimea — 12 years later
Літак Ан-26 (Ілюстративне фото: Вікіпедія)

On March 31st, around 6:00 p.m. Moscow time, a military transport An-26 aircraft disappeared from radar screens during a routine flight over Crimea. Wreckage was found within hours in a mountainous forest near the village of Kuibyshevo in the Bakhchisaray district. All 29 people on board perished.

Among the passengers was Lieutenant General Alexander Otroshchenko, commander of the mixed aviation corps of the Northern Fleet since 2024. His death was confirmed by Murmansk Region Governor Andrey Chibis at a regional government meeting on April 6th—six days after the crash and only after Russian BBC Service reported it citing sources in the Northern Fleet.

A Career Written into the Timeline of Aggression

Otroshchenko was born in 1962 in Stavropol and graduated with honors in 1985 from the Stavropol Higher Military Aviation Pilot School. His subsequent career included commanding the naval aviation of the Black Sea Fleet from 2010 to 2013, participation in the annexation of Crimea in 2014, and operations in Syria supporting Assad's regime. He was an honored pilot of Russia and, according to BBC, one of those who directly ensured air cover for the occupation in 2014.

An irony difficult to overlook: the general who began his career advancement with the annexation of Crimea perished over the same Crimea—aboard a Soviet-era aircraft that crashed into a cliff during a "routine flight."

What is Officially Known About the Crash

The Russian Defense Ministry stated there was no "impact damage" to the fuselage—officially ruling out the possibility of being shot down. The preliminary cause is technical malfunction. The Investigative Committee opened a criminal case under Article 351 of the Russian Criminal Code—violation of flight rules or preparation for them.

"Among them was the commander of the fleet's aviation Alexander Ivanovich Otroshchenko, whom we saw literally just a couple of days before this"

Andrey Chibis, Governor of Murmansk Region, at an operational meeting on April 6th

The Murmansk Region government honored the memory of those who died with a moment of silence. No official information about other passengers was released.

The Fourteenth—or the Twentieth?

BBC called Otroshchenko the 14th Russian general to die since the start of the full-scale invasion. The Moscow Times, which maintains its own count, gives the figure as 20—the difference is explained by counting criteria: who to count as a general by position versus by rank, and whether to include those who died in non-combat circumstances.

  • December 2025: near Moscow, the car of Lieutenant General Fanil Sarvarov from the General Staff was blown up—Sky News interpreted this as a possible signal from Ukraine about its ability to strike command personnel.
  • October 2025: the son of General Arkady Marzoev, commander of the 18th General Army, died in the Zaporizhzhia direction.
  • Now—the commander of the aviation corps of the Northern Fleet, who crashed into a cliff over the occupied peninsula.

The An-26 is a Soviet transport aircraft withdrawn from production back in 1986. The fact that the highest-ranking aviation commander of the Northern Fleet was flying in such an aircraft raises a separate question about logistics and the state of the Russian military transport aviation fleet after three years of war.

The investigation is officially underway. If the Russian Investigative Committee concludes that technical malfunction was the primary cause—this would mean either systemic degradation of the aircraft fleet or an admission of crew error. Neither option is advantageous for Moscow on the eve of another round of ceasefire negotiations.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026