Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Horoscopes for the Prime Minister, Fortune Tellers for the Head of the Presidential Office: How Ukrainian Authorities Have Consulted with Esotericists for Decades"

# The Yermak case revealed a detail that is no news for insiders: appeals to astrologers and numerologists at Bankova and Hrushevsky have been a long-standing practice, not an anomaly.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 15, 2026 · 2 min read

"Horoscopes for the Prime Minister, Fortune Tellers for the Head of the Presidential Office: How Ukrainian Authorities Have Consulted with Esotericists for Decades"
Олег Рибачук (Фото: Центр спільних дій)

When the prosecutor read a name from Andrii Yermak's contacts at the VAKS hearing on May 12 — "Veronika Fenshui Office" — the courtroom perceived it as a scandal. Oleh Rybachuk, who headed the Secretariat of President Yushchenko in 2005–2006, reacted differently: for him, it was a recognizable picture.

What emerged in court

According to the investigation, Yermak consulted with astrologer Veronika Anikievych regarding appointments to state positions — in particular, as the prosecution claims, regarding candidates for prosecutor general Iryna Venediktova and prime minister. To communicate with Yermak, Anikievych used a separate iPhone 12 with a single contact "Andrey 2025". On December 24, 2025, during a search at Yermak's driver's residence, this contact sent her a message with the names of the heads of the SAP and NABU — Klymenko and Kryvonos. In response, "Veronika" advised him to show "harshness and active resistance" to opponents.

"There was never any esotericist, numerologist, feng shui specialist, or feng shui expert in the office at any time"

— Presidential Office spokesperson Lytvyn, May 13, 2026

Yermak himself told journalists that he did not communicate with fortune tellers and prophets, and that he has "no voodoo dolls whatsoever".

"This is not an anomaly — it's a tradition"

Rybachuk, in a comment to LIGA Editorial, said that appeals to esotericists were "quite a common practice" on Bankova and Hrushevsky streets. As an example, he cited Mykola Azarov: according to Rybachuk, the former prime minister did not go to work without consulting his horoscope.

This is not the first testimony of this kind. Former presidential press secretary Yulia Mendel had previously reported that in 2020, one of the ministers told her about "magical practices" of the head of the Presidential Office, and later reports appeared about magicians from Israel, Georgia, and Latin America who allegedly visited Yermak. Rumors about his trust in astrologers and numerologists had been circulating for a long time.

Why this is not just an anecdote

The question is not whether an official believes in horoscopes. The question is who actually makes decisions when official advisers are replaced by a person with a separate phone. According to the investigation, "Veronika Fenshui" not only "calculated" candidates for ministerial positions based on birth dates but also provided recommendations on countering anti-corruption bodies and specific journalists.

  • Anikievych's father was a member of the "Opposition Bloc"
  • Correspondence with Yermak was conducted via Signal and a separate device
  • The iPhone 12 was seized on May 11, 2026 at Anikievych's place of residence

As noted by Focus.ua, citing a commentator on the case: "There is no legal liability for him here — there is no such article in the Criminal Code. But politically, it adds to the already existing image".

If the court recognizes the correspondence with "Veronika" as evidence not only of strange interests but also of an attempt to coordinate resistance to NABU and SAP — this detail could change the qualification of episodes in the case. Whether the investigation will be able to prove that the astrologer's advice was part of a plan rather than just personal superstition will become clear at the next VAKS hearings.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026