Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Georgia extends the right to stay for some Ukrainians until 24 February 2027 — who is affected?

The Georgian government on 24 February 2026 officially extended the visa-free stay for Ukrainians who were in the country as of 24 February 2025. In short — who received relief, and who remains excluded.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Georgia extends the right to stay for some Ukrainians until 24 February 2027 — who is affected?
Грузія (Ілюстративне фото: David Mdzinarishvili / EPA)

What the government decided

In the Georgian government resolution of 24 February 2026 (source: media SOVA) it was announced that the right to visa-free stay for Ukrainian citizens who entered and were residing in Georgia before 24 February 2025 is extended. For this category, the right of stay has been extended until 24 February 2027.

Who it concerns — numbers and statuses

According to data cited by Echo of the Caucasus, about 30,000 Ukrainians live in Georgia: of them approximately 25,000 have refugee status, and about 6,290 hold a residence permit. The government's decision gives temporal stability to a significant part of this group, but applies only to those who entered by the specified date.

“About 25,000 Ukrainians with refugee status live in the country; in total about 30,000 Ukrainians in Georgia, of whom 6,290 have residence permits.”

— Irakli Kobakhidze, Prime Minister of Georgia

Why this happened — brief context

The policy on the length of visa-free stay has changed several times over the past two years: in the resolution of 23 April 2024 the period for Ukrainians was increased to three years, but on 3 April 2025 it was shortened to one year. Today's decision is a kind of partial step back toward a more liberal approach, but with clear temporal restrictions.

Diplomatic background: on 27 January 2026 the President of Ukraine appointed a new ambassador to Georgia — a signal of intensified bilateral contacts that may have influenced practical decisions concerning citizens.

What this means in practice

  • For displaced persons: an additional year provides time to complete paperwork, find employment, or regularize family matters legally.
  • For public services: a need to accelerate registration procedures and access to social services so the decision does not remain merely declarative.
  • For diplomacy: a test of whether Tbilisi and Kyiv can turn temporary measures into a stable legal solution.

Important dates

  • 23.04.2024 — the visa-free period was increased to 3 years.
  • 03.04.2025 — the period was shortened to 1 year.
  • 24.02.2026 — the government extended the right of stay for those who were in Georgia by 24.02.2025 until 24.02.2027 (source: SOVA).

Summary

This is not an automatic solution to all problems faced by displaced persons, but it is an important time buffer for tens of thousands of people. The next step is work at the level of administrative procedures and bilateral policy so that the temporary measure becomes a sustainable practice of supporting civilians who were forced to leave their homes. Whether this becomes the start of systemic solutions depends on how quickly and effectively government services and diplomats act.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026