Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Russian Hackers Breached ARMA, SAP, and Romanian Air Base Email Systems — and Accidentally Left Evidence Online

Russian-linked cybercriminals hacked over 170 mailboxes of Ukrainian prosecutors and investigators, as well as accounts in the Romanian army. They were not exposed by intelligence agencies — but by their own mistake: a server containing logs and thousands of stolen emails was left accessible to the public.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 15, 2026 · 3 min read

Russian Hackers Breached ARMA, SAP, and Romanian Air Base Email Systems — and Accidentally Left Evidence Online
Кіберзлочинець (фото: Depositphotos)

Over 284 mailboxes were compromised between September 2024 and March 2026 — that's the figure cited by British-American researchers from Ctrl-Alt-Intel, who discovered the breach. Hackers linked to Russia made a critical error themselves: a server containing logs of successful breaches and thousands of stolen emails was left accessible on the open internet. This is how it was exposed — not by counterintelligence, not by CERT-UA, but by an independent research group.

Who was compromised: from anti-corruption officials to a hospital in Pokrovsk

Among the victims are several sensitive institutions. Hackers compromised accounts in the Specialized Prosecution Office for the Defense Sector — a military body that investigates corruption and espionage in the Armed Forces. At least one employee of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecution (SAP) was also on the victims' list, though Reuters did not disclose the name.

The Agency for Asset Recovery and Management (ARMA) was also targeted — a structure that manages assets confiscated from corrupt officials and collaborators. According to Reuters, among the compromised mailboxes was the account of ARMA's then-head Yaroslava Maksymenko. At the Center for Prosecutors' Training, 44 mailboxes were breached, including the account of deputy director Oleh Duka.

The scope of the attack extended beyond Ukraine. According to Ctrl-Alt-Intel, hackers also compromised at least 67 accounts of the Romanian Air Force — including accounts at NATO airbases and at least one senior officer. Additionally, attacks were registered in Greece, Bulgaria, and Serbia.

"The hackers likely monitored investigators to get ahead of those exposing Moscow's agents, or were gathering compromising information on Kyiv officials"

Keir Giles, associate research fellow at Chatham House (London), who reviewed the victims' list

Technique — phishing, attribution — disputed

Ctrl-Alt-Intel links the operation to the known group Fancy Bear (APT28, Russian GRU). However, two independent researchers — Matthieu Faou from ESET and Feike Hacquebord from TrendAI — confirmed the Moscow connection but disagreed on the specific group: Faou stated he cannot verify Fancy Bear's involvement, while Hacquebord denied it.

  • The attack lasted at least from September 2024 through March 2026
  • Over 170 mailboxes were compromised in Ukraine, with at least 284 total across various countries
  • The hackers left the server with evidence in open access — this allowed researchers to document the operation
  • CERT-UA confirmed awareness of some of the breaches and reported conducting investigations

Faou from ESET warns against exaggeration: the exposed operation, in his words, is "only a small part of the entire Russian espionage ecosystem". In other words, what became known is not the full scale, but only the fragment where the perpetrators made a mistake.

What this means for anti-corruption investigations

The SAP conducts cases that directly affect those in power: among its high-profile investigations is the case that in November 2024 led to the resignation of President Zelensky's chief negotiator Andriy Yermak. If the correspondence of investigators and prosecutors from this institution has truly been compromised — this is not merely a data leak, but potentially an opportunity for Moscow to anticipate the actions of anti-corruption bodies or prepare pressure on key case figures.

All the named organizations — Maksymenko, Duka, ARMA, SAP, and the prosecution offices — did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.

If CERT-UA already "investigated some of the breaches," as the agency reports — why were victims not notified or other institutions with similar risk profiles not publicly warned? The answer to this question will determine whether this episode was an operational failure only by the hackers — or also by Ukraine's system for responding to cyber threats.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026