Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Long live the Shah": why Reza Pahlavi's influence is growing in Iran and what risks it poses for the region

In Iran’s central provinces, chants of “Long live the Shah” are being heard more and more often. LIGA.net and expert Ihor Semivolos see this as a sign of the growing influence of Reza Pahlavi — a phenomenon that could change the balance of power in the country and complicate an exit from the crisis. For Ukraine this is a security issue: Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has already advised Ukrainian citizens to leave Iran.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 9, 2026 · 2 min read

"Long live the Shah": why Reza Pahlavi's influence is growing in Iran and what risks it poses for the region

What’s happening

According to LIGA.net and in the assessment of Igor Semivolos, director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, support for the son of the last shah — Reza Pahlavi — is noticeably growing in Iran’s central provinces. At rallies the slogan “Long live the Shah” is increasingly heard, signaling not only nostalgia but also a desire for a certain kind of leadership amid the chaos.

"He is gaining increasing authority among Persians. For them this figure is significant"

— Igor Semivolos, director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies

Why this matters

The expert explains: the rise in support for Pahlavi is linked to fears of a possible collapse of the current regime. When the risk of internal disintegration arises, part of the population looks for a figure who can quickly restore order and preserve the integrity of the state. In such a case, even monarchical symbolism can act as a marker of stability.

At the same time, this heightens tensions for national minorities, who view the revival of monarchist sentiments with caution — for them it could mean risks of repression or a redistribution of influence.

"His program envisages that he is not and will not be the shah, but wants to be an arbiter who will lead the country to democracy while preserving unity. He says he wants political change, a new constitution, elections... The people can choose what they are guided to — as long as there is authority in place"

— Igor Semivolos, director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies

Security implications and for Ukraine

For Ukraine the immediate danger is a state of instability, which complicates the work of diplomatic and consular services and also increases risks for citizens on the ground. The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry has already advised Ukrainians to leave Iran due to the worsening situation.

  • 7 January: reports say up to 35 people were killed during the protests; over 1,200 were detained.
  • 8 January: the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry issued a call/advice for Ukrainians to leave the country due to deteriorating security.
  • 9 January: Iranian authorities cut internet access, effectively isolating the country from external communications during the suppression of protests.

Brief outlook

If Pahlavi's popularity continues to grow, two basic scenarios will emerge: a rapid consolidation under a single leader as a reaction to chaos, or a long-term fragmentation with increased regional/ethnic conflicts. Both scenarios carry risks for regional stability and make Iran's foreign policy less predictable.

Two things are important now: fact-checking and early diplomatic response. So far Ukraine has already responded practically — advising its citizens to evacuate; next it's up to the international community to assess potential scenarios and prepare both humanitarian and security response mechanisms.

Question to the reader: are partners ready to respond to real — not symbolic — changes in Iran quickly and in a coordinated way?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026