Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Command of the 14th Brigade Concealed Loss of Positions — General Staff Replaced Brigade Commander and Corps Chief

A scandal involving fighters left without food and water on the Kupiansk front has exposed a deeper problem: previous command did not report the true situation at the front. Personnel changes occurred following public pressure — not after an internal investigation.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Command of the 14th Brigade Concealed Loss of Positions — General Staff Replaced Brigade Commander and Corps Chief
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

Four exhausted soldiers in a photo published on Threads triggered a chain reaction: the removal of the commander of the 14th Separate Mechanized Brigade and the dismissal with demotion of the commander of the 10th Army Corps. However, the General Staff acknowledged: the problem was not just about food supplies.

What happened at the positions

The scandal erupted after a post by Ivanna Poberezhniuk — the daughter of a demobilized soldier from the 14th Brigade. Her father maintained contact with comrades who remained at positions as part of the 2nd Mechanized Battalion, attached to the 30th Brigade in Kharkiv region.

«The guys at the positions have no food or water. Command is not responding. Soldiers are losing consciousness from hunger, drinking rainwater. There are communication problems too»

— from Ivanna Poberezhniuk's post on Threads

According to her, delays with food, water, and fuel lasted from August 25. Anastasia Silchuk, the wife of one of the soldiers, simultaneously published an appeal on Facebook. The material was distributed by Ukrainska Pravda.

What the General Staff officially acknowledged

In a response dated April 24, the General Staff confirmed an objective factor: systematic Russian air and missile strikes on crossings over the Oskil River significantly complicated logistics in the Kupiansk area. Supply is now carried out by water vessels and heavy drones.

But alongside this came direct accusations against command: the previous leadership of the 14th brigade concealed the actual state of affairs, including facts about the loss of certain positions and supply shortages for personnel.

Personnel decisions

  • The commander of the 14th brigade was removed from his position; Colonel Taras Maksimov was appointed as the new brigade commander
  • The commander of the 10th Army Corps was dismissed and reassigned with a demotion; Brigadier General Artem Bogomolov took command of the corps

An important nuance: the rotation took place after the information became public — not as a result of internal audit or a vertical signal. This raises a separate question about how the system for early response to problems in units works.

If the new leadership of the 14th Brigade and 10th Corps does not restore logistics and fails to establish transparent reporting on the situation at the positions — the next scandal will again come through social media rather than through official channels.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026