Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Ukrainian Air Assault Forces commander: Russia could be exhausted on the Pokrovsk front by spring — what it means for defense

In an interview with the BBC, Brigadier General Yevhen Lasiichuk predicts a decline in enemy activity in the Pokrovsk‑Myrnohrad agglomeration — provided the Kremlin does not deploy new reserves. We explain why this matters for the front and for tactical planning.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 23, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukrainian Air Assault Forces commander: Russia could be exhausted on the Pokrovsk front by spring — what it means for defense

What the commander said

In an interview with the BBC, Brigadier General Yevhen Lasiichuk, commander of the 7th Rapid Reaction Corps of the Air Assault Forces, pointed to the possible exhaustion of Russian units in the Pokrovsk‑Myrnohrad agglomeration by spring. In his assessment, this could lead to a slowdown in the pace of advance if the Kremlin does not commit additional reserves.

“I think that by spring the enemy will be exhausted and will somewhat slow the pace of its advance, its offensive. But that, again, is if no further reserve is committed, for example, the naval infantry. We know that it is currently undergoing coordination and being brought up to strength. I’m not sure they will use it on this particular axis, but it’s possible.”

— Yevhen Lasiichuk, commander of the 7th Rapid Reaction Corps, Air Assault Forces

Resources and risks

Lasiichuk emphasized that the enemy has an advantage in manpower and equipment, but the Armed Forces of Ukraine have built a solid defense in this sector. Due to exhausting battles, the Russians are already forced to commit reserves; the commander also noted that he has data on the casualty ratios specifically in Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad.

At the same time, the Air Assault Forces commander reported that Ukraine currently cannot restore full control over Pokrovsk — a factor that affects operational decisions and the allocation of forces.

Context

Lasiichuk’s assessment aligns with that of some analysts: enemy exhaustion is a realistic scenario if additional mobilization resources are not employed. For contrast: on January 22 former US special representative Kit Kellogg expressed the hope that peace could arrive by August 24 — a political forecast that does not resolve the question of battlefield resources.

Analysts note that the key risk remains the introduction of mobile reserves (in particular the naval infantry) — in which case the balance of forces could change rapidly.

What this means

A scenario of a gradual slowdown in the offensive gives the Armed Forces of Ukraine a window to consolidate positions, regroup and resupply. But this window is conditional: if the adversary finds additional resources, the tempo of fighting may resume. Therefore, the planning task is to ensure sufficient supplies, ammunition and personnel rotations to consolidate the favorable tempo.

An interim question for partners and the front commander: what resources does Ukraine need right now to turn this potential decline in enemy activity into a stable advantage?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026