Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Corruption in territorial recruitment centers and unauthorized desertions from units undermine defense capability — Budanov announced a package of measures

The Head of the Presidential Office held a meeting with the General Staff and law-enforcement agencies: this is not a personnel matter but a direct risk to unit manning and combat readiness.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Corruption in territorial recruitment centers and unauthorized desertions from units undermine defense capability — Budanov announced a package of measures

Context

Kyrylo Budanov drew attention to two problems that directly affect defense capability: corruption in the system of Territorial Recruitment Centers (ТЦК) and unauthorized leaving of units (СЗЧ). The issues were discussed at an expanded meeting with the participation of the General Staff, the Ground Forces, the Military Law Enforcement Service and the heads of law enforcement agencies.

What Budanov said

“Abuse of official duties and the undermining of military discipline are unacceptable. We are studying the problems involved and preparing clear and effective solutions.”

— Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Office of the President

Evidence and examples

  • In December 2025 the General Staff introduced changes that make using unauthorized leaving of units (СЗЧ) as a method of transferring to another military unit impractical.
  • On January 6, 2026 the High Anti‑Corruption Court ruled that assets of the former head of the Zaporizhzhia Regional Territorial Recruitment Center totaling 3.8 million hryvnias were unjustified.
  • On January 9 the State Bureau of Investigation reported exposing an official of a Territorial Recruitment Center in the Rivne region who accepted a bribe in the form of a car; he was placed under preventive measures with the option to post bail of more than 2 million hryvnias.

Why this matters for the country

Corruption and unauthorized leaving of units (СЗЧ) are not merely legal problems: they deplete resources, create personnel gaps and undermine discipline and trust within the armed forces. When the staffing system operates opaquely, the efficiency of personnel allocation suffers, and therefore the operational readiness of units decreases.

What will change

According to the Presidential Office, “clear and effective solutions” are being prepared: a combination of rapid law‑enforcement responses, disciplinary measures and systemic reforms in the work of the Territorial Recruitment Centers. Defense analysts expect intensified inspections and an acceleration of court proceedings related to corruption cases.

A question for society and authorities: will they be able to turn these intentions into lasting practice that increases combat capability, or will it remain another declaration?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026