Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Kupiansk: Russian command has effectively abandoned its units — what that means for the front lines

The situation in Kupiansk highlights problems in Russian logistics and opens tactical opportunities for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. We examine why the statement by the Joint Forces Operation spokesperson matters right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 26, 2025 · 2 min read

Kupiansk: Russian command has effectively abandoned its units — what that means for the front lines

In brief — the gist of the statement

The spokesman for the Joint Forces Group, Viktor Tregubov, said that the Russian command effectively abandoned its units in Kupiansk. This is not an emotional assessment, but the result of a combination of haste in planning the operation and poor preparation — what military analysts call the classic problem of operational ambitions exceeding actual capabilities.

"Effectively yes, but on the other hand, they couldn't have done otherwise. They did not provide the groundwork for this operation from the start. They ran ahead too fast..."

— Viktor Tregubov, spokesman for the Joint Forces Group

What is happening on the ground

According to the spokesman and operational briefings, a mopping up of the remnants of Russian forces is currently underway in the city. At the same time, on the left bank of the Oskil River the occupiers are trying to apply pressure, are regrouping and making attempts at offensive actions, which so far have been unsuccessful.

"Ukrainian forces are driving the occupiers out of Kupiansk; there are about 100 of them there"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine (22 December)

Why this matters for Ukraine

First, it demonstrates a problem in Russian logistics and command: when an operation is planned to meet a calendar date rather than real resources, the risk of isolating units increases. Second, each such episode gives the Armed Forces of Ukraine a tactical advantage — the opportunity to eliminate remaining enemy forces, improve control over logistical hubs and strengthen defenses along the Oskil.

Military analysts note that such coordination failures are accompanied by a drop in morale within enemy units and create space for pinpoint counterattacks and reconnaissance. This is not the end of fighting in the region, but it is a chance to turn a tactical success into a sustainable operational improvement.

What’s next

The immediate steps for Ukraine are to consolidate control of the city, complete demining and the elimination of surviving enemy groups, and also reinforce defenses on the left bank of the Oskil. Politically, this is also a test: partners and military leadership will assess whether Kyiv can hold the initiative and turn tactical successes into lasting strategic strengthening of the front.

Short forecast: if the logistics and intelligence of the Armed Forces of Ukraine remain at a high level, the current situation can become an example of how local successes weaken the enemy's overall combat capability. If weak points are not secured, the risk of renewed pressure on the left bank will remain.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026