Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Kyiv dispatched drone teams to the Middle East — requests scarce Patriot missiles (PAC‑2/PAC‑3) in return

Quiet diplomacy is both a resource and a lever: Ukrainian specialists are arriving this week in Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, Kyiv is pressing for the delivery of the very air-defense systems it lacks to protect against ballistic strikes.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv dispatched drone teams to the Middle East — requests scarce Patriot missiles (PAC‑2/PAC‑3) in return
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: Marcin Obara / EPA)

Within the agreements: skills in exchange for equipment

In high diplomacy, loud statements matter less than quiet agreements. President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that this week three fully staffed, professional teams of Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle specialists are heading to Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. These are not merely consultations — this is the export of practical experience that partners in the Middle East urgently need.

What Ukraine asks in return

Kyiv is raising the issue of supplying scarce missiles for the Patriot systems — in particular the PAC‑2 and PAC‑3. The PAC‑3 is regarded as one of the few Western means capable of effectively countering ballistic missiles; the PAC‑2 retains a role in intercepting aerial targets and certain missile threats. For Ukraine, which regularly suffers ballistic attacks, this is not only a technical but a strategic question.

"Basically, we proposed this primarily to the Americans, our partners. And the fact that the Middle East today has some request of us — all of this is, in principle, part of the drone deal. So the drone deal is absolutely relevant for the United States."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Why this works as leverage

Ukrainian experience in repelling mass Shahed attacks has become a marketable product: countries facing Iranian drones are interested in practical solutions — from air-defense employment tactics to counter-battery work and the integration of counter-drone measures. In this context, the skills of Ukrainian teams are a currency that can be exchanged for rare defense resources.

"Absolutely all American experts (acquaintances and strangers alike) understand that when it comes to repelling mass Shahed attacks today, only Ukrainian experience can really help."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Consequences and scenarios

The practical outcome will depend on three factors: the willingness of the Gulf states to pay for the expert service, the U.S. political will to agree to transfer Patriot missiles, and Kyiv's ability to turn a temporary contract into a permanent cooperation format (manufacturing and scaling up UAV production). If partners agree to the exchange — it will strengthen both Ukraine's defensive potential and its diplomatic weight in the region.

Summary

In short: Ukraine is selling not only technology but operational experience; in return it insists on the delivery of the specific air-defense systems needed to repel ballistic strikes. The ball is now in the partners' court: whether this exchange will turn into concrete deliveries of PAC‑2/PAC‑3, or remain a diplomatic statement — that is the key question for the coming weeks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026