Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Kyiv's Housing Market Over a Year: Where the Money Is, Where the Risk Lies, and Why Demand Returned Sooner Than Expected

# Secondary Market Becomes Cheaper, New Construction Holds Prices, Buyers Return — But Not the Same Ones. What Has Changed on Kyiv's Real Estate Market Over the Past 12 Months.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 3 min read

Kyiv's Housing Market Over a Year: Where the Money Is, Where the Risk Lies, and Why Demand Returned Sooner Than Expected

When most analysts in summer 2022 predicted the freezing of Kyiv's real estate market for years to come, the market acted differently. Deals resumed in the fall of that same year — first cautiously, then more confidently. By 2024, demand in the capital had recovered so much that some developers raised prices again.

Primary market: stability as marketing

Developers who survived 2022 without bankruptcy found themselves in an unusual position: their product became a symbol of reliability simply because they still exist. The average price per square meter in new Kyiv residential complexes in 2024 ranges between $1,200 and $2,800 depending on class and location — and this is 10–15% higher than a year ago.

The reason is not only demand. Construction costs have risen due to logistics, labor shortages, and energy prices. Developers pass this on to buyers — and buyers are willing to accept it so far, especially if the property is already in its final stage or completed.

Key nuance: 2024 buyers are significantly more cautious about the degree of readiness of the property. Foundation excavation has practically disappeared as a sellable product — people want to see walls, or better yet, keys.

Secondary market: discounts as the norm

The picture is different on the secondary market. Owners who evacuated and did not return are listing apartments — and forced to concede on price. A discount of 10–20% from the initial asking price has become the standard in negotiations, not an exception.

A separate segment is apartments in buildings without shelters or with critical building management association problems. Such properties are sold at discounts of up to 30% and are found mainly among buyers who are counting on their own renovations and long-term ownership.

Geographically, the most noticeable decline is in areas with the worst transport accessibility to shelters and without backup power supply. The left bank lags behind the right bank by an average of 15–20% in price dynamics.

Who is buying

The buyer profile has changed fundamentally. Investment demand — people who bought apartments for resale in a year or two — has declined sharply. Instead, the share of so-called forced buyers has grown: those who sold property elsewhere in Ukraine and are moving their families to Kyiv, or those who returned from abroad and decided to settle down.

Mortgages formally exist — the state program "eOselja" offers a rate of 3% for certain categories. But the actual volume of mortgage transactions remains negligible compared to the overall market: banks are cautious in assessing collateral in wartime conditions, and buyers do not want to take on 20-year obligations given current uncertainty.

Rent as an indicator

The rental market responded to Kyiv residents' return faster than sales. The cost of renting a one-bedroom apartment in residential areas has returned to pre-war levels and in some cases exceeded it — $400–600 per month in hryvnia equivalent at the current rate. This puts pressure on those renting and simultaneously increases the appeal of buying for those with savings.

Notably: the number of rental listings in Kyiv over the past year has decreased by approximately a quarter — the supply left the market because owners either returned themselves or secured tenants and removed properties from open platforms.

What's next — and under what conditions

The market is currently sustained by two assumptions: that Kyiv will remain the administrative and economic center regardless of scenarios at the front, and that the hryvnia will not fall critically. Both assumptions are holding up so far — but they are tested daily.

If the eOselja program expands to the secondary market without restrictions on construction year — and such discussions are already underway in the Finance Ministry — this could significantly revitalize deals in the old housing stock. The question is whether the state is ready to subsidize the risk that private banks refuse to take.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026