Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Macron in Davos: "a shift toward a world without rules" — what it means for the security of Europe and Ukraine

At the World Economic Forum, Emmanuel Macron warned of a departure from the rules of the international order — we explain why this matters for our security right now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 20, 2026 · 1 min read

Macron in Davos: "a shift toward a world without rules" — what it means for the security of Europe and Ukraine

A Quiet Signal from Davos

On 8 January 2026 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, French President Emmanuel Macron warned of a “shift to a world without rules.” Reuters cites his words as a warning: in international relations the law of the strongest increasingly prevails over norms of law. A statement from the leader of one of Europe’s leading states has practical significance for the continent’s security and, in particular, for Ukraine.

“This is a shift toward a world without rules, where international law is trampled and where the only law that seems to matter is the law of the strongest.”

— Emmanuel Macron, President of France (Reuters)

Context: why this was said now

Macron tied his warnings to a number of international incidents: from attempts to gain control over Greenland to events related to Venezuela. He did not name specific actors directly, but the message was general — a resurgence of imperial ambitions and a weakening of the norms that govern international relations.

Consequences for Ukraine

The erosion of rules plays into the hands of revisionist forces seeking to change the status quo by force. According to international analysts, such a trend complicates coordination among allies, makes long-term guarantees less reliable, and raises the risk that support for countries defending their sovereignty will become fragmented. For Ukraine this means: political signals must be transformed into concrete, legally binding mechanisms of support.

What next?

Macron offered a political diagnosis — now the question to allies is whether there is enough institutional will to stop the “shift” and restore the rules of the game. For Ukraine this is not rhetoric but a direct security guarantee: strengthening the norms of international law and clear guarantees from partners are the best protection against forces that rely on coercion.

Analytical conclusion: the words in Davos are a signal to act. The question is whether capitals will turn declarations into legal and military-economic instruments that can actually change the balance of power.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026