Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Almost the Entire Dnipropetrovsk Region Liberated — General Staff: What It Means for the Front

General Komarenko reported the liberation of 400 square kilometers and that only a few settlements remain under the occupiers' control — we examine how this alters the operational picture and the region's security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Almost the Entire Dnipropetrovsk Region Liberated — General Staff: What It Means for the Front
Українські військові (Ілюстративне фото: Генштаб)

Briefly and to the point

In an interview with RBC-Ukraine, the head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff, Major General Oleksandr Komarenko, said that almost the entire territory of Dnipropetrovsk region has been liberated from Russian invaders as part of the Defense Forces' operation. According to him, a few small settlements still remain that need to be cleared.

How this was achieved

Komarenko explained that on the Oleksandrivka direction there was a decisive shift: where Russians previously operated with massed technical columns, their capabilities are now limited — largely due to the effective use of UAVs. Ukrainian air-assault and assault units, supported by mechanized brigades, carried out a planned offensive operation that went through all necessary coordination stages.

"Almost the entire territory of Dnipropetrovsk region has been liberated. There remain three small settlements to be worked on and two more to be cleared. By the way, thanks to these active actions we have positive dynamics in February — more territory was liberated than lost"

— Oleksandr Komarenko, head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff

Equipment and tactics: the role of UAVs and small groups

The General Staff and outside observers note: the development of UAVs has changed the character of the fighting. Instead of large operations in the open field, the Russians increasingly resist with smaller, localized groups — a tactical approach that is more vulnerable to reconnaissance and concentrated fire. This has given the Ukrainian Armed Forces the opportunity to act more precisely and effectively, minimizing risks to populated areas and logistical hubs.

Context and confirmation

Earlier, on 20 February, President Zelensky reported the liberation of about 300 km² in the south, without disclosing details. On 22 February the Air Assault Forces confirmed offensive actions on the Oleksandrivka direction, and on 23 February Commander Syrskyi spoke of the liberation of 400 km². A journalistic analysis by LIGA.net adds to this picture regarding the Russians' intent to create a buffer zone in Dnipropetrovsk region — a plan that, it appears, was not realized.

What’s next

Strategically, this strengthens the security of Dnipro and adjacent districts, eases logistics and reduces the threat of creating a long-term buffer zone. However, mopping up and consolidation of control over the liberated territories are still needed — this is a technically complex and lengthy process. Analysts and military experts agree that the current momentum is a positive signal, but turning tactical successes into sustainable strategic advantages will require resources, intelligence and partner support.

The key question now is whether these liberations can be turned into a long-term advantage on the southern and eastern flanks of the front, and how quickly partners can bolster the defensive and logistical capacity of our army?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026