Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Merkel Against Intermediaries: Europe Should Negotiate Itself — But Who Exactly and With What Powers?

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel has criticized the EU for diplomatic passivity and called on current leaders — not mediators — to take the peace process into their own hands. At the same time, she herself is being considered as a candidate for the role of envoy, which she publicly does not want.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 18, 2026 · 3 min read

Merkel Against Intermediaries: Europe Should Negotiate Itself — But Who Exactly and With What Powers?
Ангела Меркель (Фото: Filip Singer/EPA)

Angela Merkel served as Chancellor for 16 years and personally led the Minsk negotiations in 2014–2015. So when she says that the European Union is squandering its diplomatic influence, it is not abstract criticism. It is an assessment from someone who knows what a real negotiating room looks like.

What Merkel said

In an interview with broadcaster WDR, cited by Politico, the former German Chancellor stated that peace negotiations with Russia regarding Ukraine should be led by current officials from European states, not external mediators. She criticized the EU for failing to use its diplomatic potential to end the war.

"I believe the military support we have provided so far is absolutely correct. [...] But we must take this into our own hands" — and by "we," Merkel meant those currently in power.

Angela Merkel, WDR interview

According to Merkel, times have changed: Europe must now act as a real deterrent to Russia — building up its defensive capacity and supporting Ukraine while maintaining diplomatic channels. "We did not achieve success, but attempts to prevent the invasion were not a mistake," she said, commenting on her own pre-war policies.

Paradox: She herself is a candidate

While Merkel calls on current leaders to act, behind the scenes in the EU she herself is being considered as a potential envoy for negotiations with Moscow — precisely because of her personal contacts with Putin and Zelensky, according to Spiegel citing sources in European political circles. Other candidates mentioned include Finnish President Alexander Stubb and former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi.

Merkel's office confirmed that no official requests for such a role have been received. They declined to answer whether she would accept.

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas took a hardline stance: it would be "not very wise" to allow the Kremlin to dictate the negotiator's candidacy. According to three EU diplomats, Kallas herself has effectively ruled herself out as a possible envoy due to her anti-Russian reputation. Munich Security Conference Chair Wolfgang Ischinger emphasized that a mediator must have broad support in the EU — particularly from Eastern Europe and the Baltic states.

Reaction from Eastern Europe

Reactions to Merkel's interview itself proved divided. Former Latvian Prime Minister Krišjānis Kariņš stated that "one cannot act in good faith with Putin" and accused Merkel of ignoring Baltic concerns. Estonia's Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna noted: "Russia itself is responsible for this aggression" — rejecting any interpretation that places part of the blame on the West.

  • Merkel personally led the Minsk negotiations in 2014–2015 — and critics consider them failed precisely because they did not stop the war but only postponed full-scale invasion.
  • Putin proposed involving former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder in negotiations — a proposal rejected by both Berlin and Brussels.
  • The biggest problem in choosing a negotiator, according to Politico, is not Russia's or Ukraine's position, but Europe's inability to agree on a single candidate.

Merkel's declaration that Europe "must take this into our own hands" contains no mechanism: no mandate, no format, no definition of who specifically should sit at the table. It is a diagnosis, not a plan.

If the EU does not agree on a candidacy with broad support — including from Eastern Europe — by the end of the month, when foreign ministers are to discuss the envoy question, Brussels risks remaining a bystander in negotiations that will determine the continent's security architecture going forward.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026